Anyone else notice the reported traffic lower than other providers?

[cyphix]

I've been using imonetize for a week now & I'm not sure if this happens for all my domains; but I sure notice it for my domains with larger amount of traffic...

I know that every sponsor counts traffic differently, but I have parked these names at almost every sponsor at one time or another & the traffic has NEVER been reported this low... so seeing as imonetize use other sponsors & don't actually count the traffic themselves, I don't see how it's possible for the such low reports of traffic.

Here are a few examples..

Domain - ND Avg Daily Count - TrafficZ Count - sedo Count - Imonetize Count

domain1 - 640 - 1129 - 1036 - 194
domain2 - 145 - N/A - 207 - 129
domain3 - 101 - 493 - 199 - 58

Just does't make sense..... ???

[HOMEY1234]

I've been using imonetize for a week now & I'm not sure if this happens for all my domains; but I sure notice it for my domains with larger amount of traffic...

I know that every sponsor counts traffic differently, but I have parked these names at almost every sponsor at one time or another & the traffic has NEVER been reported this low... so seeing as imonetize use other sponsors & don't actually count the traffic themselves, I don't see how it's possible for the such low reports of traffic.

Here are a few examples..

Domain - ND Avg Daily Count - TrafficZ Count - sedo Count - Imonetize Count

domain1 - 640 - 1129 - 1036 - 194
domain2 - 145 - N/A - 207 - 129
domain3 - 101 - 493 - 199 - 58

Just does't make sense..... ???

Quoted from post: http://www.dnforum.com/f376/you-satisfied-thread-185997.html

Every provider has there own idea of what a View is (IE are they counting BOT hits, NON Us Visits, Uniques). That is one thing that could account for it. The other is if it is a name that some providers don’t monetize. (IE TM or Adult). Either of those could cause what appear to be low views in the beginning.

*** NEW*** The only other thing it could be is that some providers take longer to add the names into thier systems, but that shouldn't take over a week by any means.

Again Hope that helps.


JN

[Bodis.com]

I have 1 domain parked at iMonetize, which normally received 1500-2000 unique visitors per day parked with my web host. When I parked with iMonetize, has been very bumpy road in terms of unique visitors. Here is the report so far:

Date Views
October 31, 2006 757
October 30, 2006 870
October 29, 2006 908
October 28, 2006 770
October 27, 2006 1001
October 26, 2006 1051
October 25, 2006 1087
October 24, 2006 1116
October 23, 2006 1100
October 22, 2006 859
October 21, 2006 660
October 20, 2006 944
October 19, 2006 1288
October 18, 2006 1360
October 17, 2006 908
October 16, 2006 49


Anyway, so far I've been quite happy with iMonetize. There have been 1 or 2 really good days, and if in the end, it will be optimized to make the most revenue it should be like those best days and I'll be looking forward to that. Another half a month to go! :happy:

[HOMEY1234]

Anyway, so far I've been quite happy with iMonetize. There have been 1 or 2 really good days, and if in the end, it will be optimized to make the most revenue it should be like those best days and I'll be looking forward to that. Another half a month to go! :happy:

Now Thats the idea...

[kellypitts@alltel]

I too have noticed reported uniques at about HALF or less than normal on many domains we have at Imonitize, but am told that the uniques and pay will go up after the first month. I am approaching a month's testing so far - so the real test is coming second month.

Most domains we have with them are benign domains that have to do with fishing, news, aquariums, etc.... so I know that most are not being banned due to offensive content as Imon has said can be the case at times with certain parking companies. However, my traffic remains very low with them - on even the most family-friendly domains.

I still have not had one day in month number one on any domain that income has topped what I get elsewhere. I'm holding out for this promise land they speak of.