Location/City names .info VS .net VS .org

[Provider]

Lets say I have a location names like

Newyork.info
Newyork.org
Newyork.net
Newyork.us

If one of them is 100% of the value, what will be the value of other extensions? I hear drom many people that .info is much stronger for locations
than .net, what do you think?

[Leading Names]

Lets say I have a location names like

Newyork.info
Newyork.org
Newyork.net
Newyork.us

If one of them is 100% of the value, what will be the value of other extensions? I hear drom many people that .info is much stronger for locations
than .net, what do you think?

Newyork.info 100%
Newyork.us 80% (if location is in America, obviously)
Newyork.org 75%
Newyork.net 30% (.net sucks for location type sites/domains)

- Rob

[Provider]

Thanks Rob for your input, I was surprised how low .net valued by you.
Never knew that .net sucks for location names

[etech-peter]

I agree, .net doesn't go that well with location/city names as compared to .info, .net is best suited for commercial and networking related sites. Even .org doesn't match that well for a city name unless ofcourse it's for an organisation based in that particular city.

[Zoobar]

With your example newyork I would rank as follows.

newyork.us
newyork.org
newyork.info
newyork.net

First two ranked by traffic, the last two by developed value. I always rank traffic against the so called "ideal extensions" better because natural type in traffic always means success and growth with a developed product.

[David G]

No question in my view that newyork.org is far and away the best.

[david4]

1 .info
2 .net (quite same as .info)

I dont even want mention .org.... not worth anything....
according to the population of .net, I still give it a better rank.