If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Yes
No
hmm
turns out Lawrence Ng isn't ceo anymore. he's chairman
http://domainnamewire.com/2008/11/14...of-overseenet/
Jeff Kupietzky is the man to answer the questions now
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhvzWHpDelc
nice to see he has a sense of humour
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQ8Cv...eature=related
Remember the poker scandal with UB/Absolute where it started with 1 cheating account and after a thorough invistigation in ended up being more like 100 different accounts?
This whole bidding scandal is going to wind up being more than just the Halvarez accounts but more than likely multiple accounts. With thorough investigations those auctions in which Halvarez bid you up and some other bidder bids again right before you (close to your reserve) .. those bidder accounts might also end up being fraduluant.
I guess what im saying is when you take the "buyout" and it turns out many more of your auctions in which you were not paid turned out to be snapname bidders, then what? Im not sure there is anything you can do at that point after agreeing to the buyout fine print.
I will only sign that I will not sue for auctions related to "halvarez" as the second bidder, not all auctions.
www.bluepixel.gr I like .info!
Now accepting .gr domain registrations from any foreign company or individual. Contact me for details.
This is the point: For once, you don't have to accept the f%cking.
We all know what goes on but, for one of the first times ever, a company has actually been caught red-handed and, because of their own interests in clawing back the $25m they paid, the parent company have gone public, believing that the vast majority of domainers will be too stupid or too lazy to push for anything more than a ridiculously limited settlement, and that Oversee will come out ahead.
Smarter domainers such as Kevin Ham and Frank Schilling are being treated differently and, as we speak, their lawyers are hammering out deals that more accurately reflect what they would win in a legal action - you can be sure that they are not talking federal rates of interest and that no-one, on either side of the table, is bothering to suggest that there was only one account. It is extremely likely that, in return for their agreement not to push for criminal proceedings, the big domainers will probably get more out of this than they ever put into Snapnames.
Rust Consulting are being paid huge amounts of money to help Oversee spin this in exactly the right way and to calculate exactly the minimum amount of pay-out they can get away with, when you factor in both human inertia and the lack of organisation or central focus among domainers.
Think of this like owning a house on a block that a huge corporation wants to build a skyscraper on - most of your neighbours will accept the first seemingly generous offer they receive, especially if it is spun to make it sound as if there is no more money in the pot. A few smarter home-owners will, however, hold out for a better deal, knowing that, without their agreement, the skyscraper cannot be built.
In this case, Oversee need to clear the massive liabilty hanging over Snapnames and, indeed, their whole group. While it is there, they will struggle to find further funding at reasonable rates, or investment at good terms. They will be unable to spin-off Snapnames. They will be at a perceived disadvantage in every business negotiation, every portfolio sale, because everyone will know how much they need the money. They will be unable to get legal liability insurance for their other ventures.
As long as even a possibility of legal action is out there, they will have to operate in an extremely wary mode, careful that no employee says or does anything that might assist a case against them - the company will, in effect, be paralysed.
That is why they are systematically going to settle with anyone and everyone who has skin in this game. They will with all the easy-money idiots, while also neutralising anyone with obvious fire-power - the Kevin Hams, the Frank Schillings etc. Then, when they've cleared both the Godzillas and the low-hanging fruit, they will have to deal with the handful of domainers who held out organized an action, to whom they will have to offer something resembling a fair settlement, they won't have any other choice. We will not get the same deal that the Godzillas are already getting but we will, at least, not be played for fools.
I called Snapnames (long phone wait) and Rust Consulting (quick response) and gave them my request & info respectively. I am confident this will lead to more transparency. We'll see.
Yes - in a normal, legally-informed situation of this type, the guilty party would give a FULL refund of money paid as a consequence of ALL the auctions in which their VP participated in any capacity. That would be a natural expectation, no discussion required. Any further negotiation would revolve around the question of whether their VP had artificially engineered a climate in which customers came to believe that they HAD to place bids at Snapnames rather than just let domains drop naturally.
Snapnames are actually taking quite a risk in making this low-ball offer - they really only have one chance to kill a serious uprising that will pursue proper recompense but, by placing so many limitations upon it and by betting so heavily on the legal ignorance of most domainers, they might have pushed their luck too far.
Well, the "rebate offer" is good for one year. I'm going to hold off on signing it until I can see my entire history, otherwise I will jump on the class action bandwagon...
This is the part i don't understand...why are they giving people one year? Seems like an awfully long time if their goal is to move on from this situation quickly.
Why aren't they putting the pressure on domainers?
I replied and asked for my history. It seems weird I was impacted only in 4% of the domains I bought through SnapNames.
I can't believe what a joke these rebate offers are. They're literally only accounting for auctions that you won and had the cost bumped up by halvarez, but there is so much more to it, SO much more.
Though I have to say, I find it rather amusing when halvarez and I were the only two people bidding on certain domains, yet my trademark was in them.
What you're saying perfectly makes sense but it depends on the stakes. If snapnames says they owe you $100 as a result of halvarez rigging and you think it should be $300 it doesn't make sense at all to sue...
For the big spenders it's different because the disputed amounts are much higher.
So only a handful of customers will consider going the legal route IMO. The majority of domainers will not be involved in a lawsuit against snap unless there is a class action and they can conveniently jump on the bandwagon.
Clearly, this is a risk mitigation exercise and a pretty good one, but what else do you expect ?
NameNewsletter.com - free lists of available domain names
ZoneFiles.net (beta) - ccTLD and gTLD droplists
Bookmarks