What A Fool Believes...

[barefoot]

http://thecoffeedesk.com/news/index....n-you-need-it/

LOL

[DotComGod]

Damn I thought it would be a song by the Doobies...

Interesting read though.

-=DCG=-

[jasdon11]

Stephen (last name kept private) is currently a student at the University of South Carolina with a major in computer science. He is very knowledgeable when it comes to current as well as up-and-coming software technologies, and is renown for his intuitive reviews of software products and services.

"Last name kept private" .... probably to save his family embarassment!

[Acquisition]

Sounds like someone pissed off that he arrived to the domain game late. Pissed off that he missed the boat..

Who is he kidding here.....I bet if he could go back to 1993, he'd register a ton of premium dotcoms.

[draggar]

I always wonder why when people do this in any other industry they're a "good businessman" or "they're thinking for the future" yet with domains they're scum-sucking cybersquatters.

If I know an area of land that is going to shoot up in value in the next 10 years and buy dozens of acres for $100 an acre - I was a "smart investor" 10 years down the road when I sell them at $50,000 an acre.

If I know a certain model car is going to be limited release and I buy a few at $15,000 and then sell them 10 years from now at $75,000 each, I was a smart investor.

Yet if I see that a certain domain (or niche) will go up in value and invest in them at $10 a pop, I am a cybersquatter.

WTF?

[nameadvertising.com]

I found it necessary to wage an argument with them for these are the very kind of ignorant fools who hurt our business without us knowing it happening.

Bro,
I sure can't suppress what ignorance you toons indulge in, but you clearly suppress dissent. Ignorance is bliss and keeps your silly opinions engraved in your pathetic brains.

I do well. $150,000 in sales, part of which below and gunning for over $200k this year.

http://www.chrisdesouza.com/images/chris-sales.bmp

Do something worthwhile rather than sink in your convoluted ignorance. Makes you look stupid in the realm of the larger online world which you are clearly oblivious of.

I am not mad. Just asking you kindly to have the balls to accept dissent. Losers!

I will post this on my blog you floozies. That would be evidence of ignoramus blokes like you who clearly have no other power than the ability to access the Internet.

Chris

--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Anthony Cargile <thecoffeedesk@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Anthony Cargile <thecoffeedesk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The Coffee Desk Comment Withheld
To: chrisdesouza@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 6:04 PM

heh, You're just mad because you're a cybersquatter and we bashed scum like you. Your email address gives it away clearly.

You know, we got similar nasty emails from other (much much larger) companies for bashing their products in a similar yet more direct manner. You're no different, except you're just small-time. We don't give a flying **** what you think, and you can't suppress what we write (this goes back to the whole "free opinion" thing you brought up).

Maybe our next article should be about one business in particular, eh?

-TCD

On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Chris Desouza <chrisdesouza@yahoo.com> wrote:

Tony,
You hypocrite. Give me a break. That floozy is posturing false dogma about "domain names" for your unsuspecting readers. And you bear my corrective stance as inappropriate.

Get lost. Let free opinions prevail. For you are no bastion of free speech any more than those in Tehran and Beijing.

Get some balls, will you?

Chris


--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Anthony Cargile <thecoffeedesk@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Anthony Cargile <thecoffeedesk@gmail.com>
Subject: The Coffee Desk Comment Withheld
To: support@chrisdesouza.com
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 11:21 AM

This is email is the response to a comment made on TheCoffeeDesk.com
using this email as the commentator's email address. Your comment
(authored by: Chris Desouza, posted in "What You Need, When You Need
It") was not posted due to either violence, threats, spamish-content,
or a genuine lack of constructive feedback.

As we clearly state in our FAQ, we reserve the right to withhold a
comment if it does not meet our requirements. Your comment did not,
and therefore was posted.

Negative feedback is appreciated as much as positive feedback, but
there is a right and wrong way of doing it.

You are still welcome to post a comment in the future, as long as it
meets our guidelines (stated in our FAQ).

Regards,
The Coffee Desk Team.