I have used vbSEO on one of my forums after procrastinating about it for a long time becuase I hate worrying about frequent upgrades and versions... Way back when it got popular to re-write urls I think the static url's really made a difference because Google thought they were true HTML pages, but now adays, Google is well aware of the re-write and the reasons for it.....
VBSEO is a great product but I did not see a title wave of new traffic because of it. I added it to an old domain which was always a forum and the traffic did not seem to increase because of it... I watched pretty closely to see if it would make a big difference and it did not seem to. This is my experience with it....
What I like most about it is its archive structure and how it changes it into a site map rather then a possible duplicate content trap.. For me, that is one of the key reasons I used it becuase I have always hated that default vb archive....
Google posted a blog entry now telling webmasters not to use rewrite rules for dynamic URLs, at least in most cases.
Google say, in bold, “avoid reformatting a dynamic URL to make it look static.” But Google also admitted that “static URLs might have a slight advantage in terms of clickthrough rates.” However, Google said “dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.”
http://searchengineland.com/google-s...urls-14795.php
I have about 4 forums and one of them is rewritten...
I think the most important part of a forum is the people, the mods, the admins, and the community...
If you have a good membership, the forum will thrive with or without static urls
Bookmarks