Good news!
They dont have permission to store copyrighted data
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!Story
Google Inc. lost a copyright lawsuit Tuesday to Belgian newspapers that had demanded it remove headlines and links to news stories posted without their permission. The ruling, if confirmed, could set a precedent for how Web search engines link to copyrighted material in the tumultuous arena of online news.
The company behind the world's most-used search engine immediately said it would appeal, claiming its Google News service was "entirely legal" and the Belgian decision was a one-time result that would not be repeated elsewhere.
The Brussels Court of First Instance ruled that California-based Google could not call on exemptions, such as claiming "fair use" because it says it reviews press articles when it displays headlines, a few lines of text, photos and links to the original page.
Good news!
They dont have permission to store copyrighted data
Good thing those two guys got their millions last week...just in case.
BackAlley.com Backhole.com BlackAfricans.com BrownWomen.com Breathers.com & More!
If you have to explain what your domain name means, give up, it's a crappy name!
Another blow to google. Just read a report where they did not win the ruling for the lawsuit to obtain the Gmail trademark.
Strange... you would think that if the news links were in a position to cause such concern, there would also be an equally large chunk of referrals coming into the site from G. Perhaps I'm missing something?
Poland City Portfolio For Sale: Bialystok.com | Gdynia.com | Sosnowiec.com | Torun.com | Zabrze.com | Olsztyn.com | Rybnik.com | Tychy.com | Elblag.com | Opole.com | ZielonaGora.com | Wloclawek.com
Am I missing something but why wouldn't you want traffic to your news stories no matter where it comes from? As long as they are giving the link to the original news source and bringing them visitors why would they complain about that? It's free advertising.
All prices are valid for 72 hours.
By the way, not to infringe on your thread Rock but this is the link to losing the Gmail trademark dispute in case it had not been posted elsewhere.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01...demark_battle/
I agree and why stop at just google? AOL, MSN, Yahoo search engines all next?
See, I think the Belgium company is the one at a lost here. Can you imagine the amount of traffic Google must send to them? In my opinion Google will probably NOT pay to use there content and the Bel. Comp will lose the traffic... not a good lawsuit in my opinion. This is one win that's a worthless lost!
All prices are valid for 72 hours.
Perhaps they do view Google as a cash cow. Not sure what the motivation is with the Belgian court rulings. Brussels is also home to NATO headquarters which includes many EU nations. So, does the rest of the world rely solely on the Belgian press to report the news regarding anything NATO related?
Next thing you know, they're going to sue google for not showing their sites in
their search results.
Vidi, Vici, Veni!
newspaper company is an idiot
Domaining to the max.
ohhh these crazy kids..
Last edited by Focus; 02-14-2007 at 06:56 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
I'm buying credit, banking, loan, insurance related generics in .com, .net, .org with high search volumes/traffic. Will consider typos too! - PLEASE PM with name, info, & asking price!
Bookmarks