View Profile
View Forum Posts
View Forum Threads
View Friends
View Blog Entries
Reply With QuotePurpose of this post? Are you a 16 year old on a domain forum looking for answers on an ethical sociology-psychological homework assignment?
If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!
If it was a matter of life or death and she could only pick one, would a woman choose to save her son or his father (assuming she loves both)?
Who would a father pick given the same scenario (the son or his mother, again assuming he loves them)?
Now substitute the son for a daughter. Who will the parents choose?
Explain why the mother or father will make the choice you believe they would. The purpose of the questioning is to determine rational and emotional decision making.
Purpose of this post? Are you a 16 year old on a domain forum looking for answers on an ethical sociology-psychological homework assignment?
Plug the names into Estibot and see which one worth more to save.
At that point our natural instinct would be to yell "Run"
Nobody is saving anybody, they are on their own.
The father would save the dog, the mother the cat.
All offers good for 72 hours except running auctions
Progeria Research | Pulmonary Fibrosis | Dammit!
Ok! I take it no one cares to participate.
Originally Posted by Infoproliferati
There are too many variables.
The question is nonsense and thus why nobody is participating.
Last edited by cbk; 05-16-2012 at 09:22 PM.
Assuming they love both, the Mother and Father would save each other before saving the child... Although losing your child would be devastating, you can always make another child with the partner you love.
It's nonsense because you don't understand the reasoning behind it... Try opening your mind.
Actually, the questions are straight forward. I think no one wants to take the time (or has the time?) to defend their answer. That's understandable.
The questioning isn't to determine who is more important but WHY one person is chosen instead of the other. The prime assumption made so as to diminish the relevance of any variables is that all parties are loved equally.
And thanks for responding Raider. You've presented a new scenario no one has mentioned before. (I've got close to twenty responses from other avenues).
People either don't care or are afraid to think of it.
You put people on the spot.
Good questions. I don't know the answer, though.
Toy It For Free. Toyit.com.
This sounds like the plot of the novel/movie Sophie's Choice, except in this story I think the choice was between two children. Pretty horrible, anyway. :(
www.ebooksfreetoday.com closed, but still contains links to Kindle free downloads' lists
My Sedo portfolio (prices slashed on 30 domains from tomorrow till the end of May)
I hand reg'd WhiteGoods.org. That is all.
???
www.ebooksfreetoday.com closed, but still contains links to Kindle free downloads' lists
My Sedo portfolio (prices slashed on 30 domains from tomorrow till the end of May)
As a father of four, I would choose the child. My reason being that I am responsible for the child, not my wife.
I would expect my wife to say the same thing BTW.
DNGazette.com - for sale
I agree with jasdon11. I have a daughter and I would save my daughter before my wife AND I would want her to do the same. Any parent who loves their child would do the same. If you aren't a parent, then you wouldn't understand.
Sometimes the love emotion is not as strong as the self-preservation instinct, in which case in both scenarios, only one survives.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks