If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the largest domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 105,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.
Register Today on DNForum IT'S FREE!I thought it was already a rule here, but I don't see it in the FAQs, so it must have been at another forum.
The first clue in the vast majority of domainer scams and fraud is invalid WHOIS info.
I'm interested in a domain listed for sale on tyhis forum right now, but:
1) The domain is registered to a different country than the user selling it
2) The name / address is similar, but jumbled.
3) The email address is clearly bogus (as in no_valid_email@attworldnet.com or something similar)
Even if the seller is honest with a good reputation here, the domain may have already been hijacked without his knowledge., In this case, I sent an email to the registered address to confirm is was for sale, and DID NOT receive a response.
My suggestion in to REQUIRE accurate whois data (not privacy protected either) on domains BEFORE they can be listed for sale.
FYI, a lot of registrars (especially eNom) can be slow about getting the update 'published'. But still -- this should be done BEFORE listing the domain for sale.
I really surprised there are no replies to this -- nobody else wants to know that domain sellers actually own the domains they are posting for sale at DNF??
Quite right, whois should be correct before any payments for any sale.
The part about privacy protected , not everyone can agree to it ( I got no prob.) some people may not want to make whois public.
If it's privacy protected , one can't reply from an address such as domainname.ext @ SomePrivacyProtect.extension
Simple solution is to send an email with some code/anything to the listed email address (even if privacy protected most registrars either forward the email to the domain owner or provide means to send the owner a message ) and ask the seller to confirm code/message via pm.
For SALE : The hottest name this cricket season IPL5.com .PM offers..
Well that would exclude just about every .ca domain. They are privacy protected by default by the registry to adhere to Canadian privacy laws.![]()
Zombie Movie Bong of the Dead - Get it on DVD or via Digital Download Today! ~ "This is a sure winner." - Tommy Chong
Isn't that already a policy for ICANN? The WhoIs information has to be accurate or else you can lose the domains?
Save the wolves - join The Wolf Army today!
Please follow the rules or suffer the wrath of Thor's Hammer.
Yes, and many domainers here ignore that a put fake info, including a fake email in the whois registry. Look at StockPhotography.org -- fake email, fake phone, incorrect country.... yet it's listed for sale here.
It also add the possibility that even if the seller DID own it, what happens if it's repossesed by ICANN after the buyer pays for it?
Then be evil - report them to ICANN and wait for the domain to be dropped.![]()
Save the wolves - join The Wolf Army today!
Please follow the rules or suffer the wrath of Thor's Hammer.
The issue is that we cannot police the WhoIs information, that isn't our jurisdiction. Yes, we can ask people to keep the information accurate but even if it looks legit, it might not be.
I'm sure there are ways of them proving that they own the domain - changing the WhoIs to show it is for sale here, changing one of the DNS (4th etc.) to FOR.SALE.AT.DNF etc..?
Now - I agree, for easier sales and better transparency, people should keep accurate WhoIs information but some people are afraid of getting spammed, etc..
I've received extremely few phone calls (and it was insults because I was "competing" with another site)
I do get spam - gMail has a great spam filter (don't worry, I use another email address as the registrar contact).
Save the wolves - join The Wolf Army today!
Please follow the rules or suffer the wrath of Thor's Hammer.
Been there done that - it doesn't work. (And I had good reason to try and get the domain's WHOIS info changed). The domain certainly won't get dropped. The procedure is thus:
1) A complaint is lodged with ICANN about a domain. Lets say the domain is example.org, registered at Example Registrar. ICANN must reply within something like 60 days.
2) ICANN briefly review the WHOIS information. If/when they find that the WHOIS information of example.org is false (be it with a fake phone number, name, address etc) they forward the complaint to Example Registrar.
3) Example Registrar then are meant to ensure that the WHOIS information is accurate/up-to-date. This is the flaw; Example Registrar can simply ignore this.
4) At the end of the complaint process, ICANN send an automated e-mail asking for the complainant to check if the WHOIS information is now accurate. Another flaw; ICANN don't check again themselves.
5) In my case it wasn't, so I contacted back saying nothing had been changed. ICANN never followed it up and the WHOIS information is still false many months later.
So yeah, I think this rule should come into play - ICANN don't do anything about fake WHOIS information, but we should![]()
invalid email address and no resposne form that email to verify is the reddest of all red flags.
i suggested the same thing a couple of years ago, when a member was offering domains for sale, where the whois info was "shady".
was told to "mind my own business and stop trying to stifle their sales"
as usual they tried to run me out of town, but i stood my ground.
with the privacy features, as others have mentioned it would be hard to enforce and speaking truthfully... i wouldn't even want to be bothered.
members just have to do their homework.
Need A SedoPro Account PM Me * nev.org * pmm.org * svc.net * ispoof.com * umm.org * sop.net * qfm.net * upyo.com * vioz.com * uce.org * wta.net * eoso.com * Coming Soon: Appraise.xxx
Anyone who cannot turn off the privacy feature while the domain is listed for sale does not have control of the domain, and therefore cannot complete a sale. It is a scam.
Yes , it should be somewhat mandatory , atleast in those cases where privacy is not turned on.
Quite true.
i agree members have to do their homework. Afterall it's not possible to check every domain listed on DNF.
The only reason i wanted to raise this thread again is because , a lot of of domains listed ( including sales already over) have been repeatedly listed with false whois. It's not just isolated to one domain. i mean different names , sometimes inexistent , even states , addresses , country , phone no. etc. do not match.
Don't wish to name any member in public , so what to do in these cases ? Should we just use the report button on the post ( because as yet there is no concrete rule with regards to this)
Thanks
For SALE : The hottest name this cricket season IPL5.com .PM offers..
No real estate company would participate in a sale where the property deed said the owner was "xxx xxxx", and if we're going to treat domaining as a 'real business', we shouldn't either.
Fake whois and privacy protection are the tools of the scam artist. Why make it easy for them?
I understand that this is policy on another forum, and has worked well. I don't see why it would not work just as well here.
if you arre viewing a thread of interest and you happen to check whois, and you "know" that the whois info, is "not" accurate for the member who is advertising it for sale or asking for an appraisal, then you can:
ask or raise the question and or report the thread, including "factual" evidence...if you wish
all real concerns, but i just don't buy from those i don't trust
members can choose to do the same
but you need to have some level of trust within the community, though not be gullible and naive'...or lazy about the biz of domains
still, you can do all that and make a bad deal..from somebody you trusted with whois you trusted...
you feel me?
whois gonna police that?
we all have to, we have to be more observant as members, as buyers and as sellers.
as for a policy, imo...
it would be a exhausting task to pick and choose which domains to verify or not
if that burden was a staff function and duty of the forum.
the forum, potentially could bear responsibility for scams, should it/if it state/stated that it verified the whois of a member and later it was found to be fake.
now that's just my personal "non-moderator" opinion
![]()
Need A SedoPro Account PM Me * nev.org * pmm.org * svc.net * ispoof.com * umm.org * sop.net * qfm.net * upyo.com * vioz.com * uce.org * wta.net * eoso.com * Coming Soon: Appraise.xxx
I disagree.
The vast majority of honest sellers here already accurate WHOIS info, and the ones that don't will figure out quickly that they have to put the correct into there if they want to sell domains on DNF.
I would expect very, very few 'violations' reported, except for the scammers... and this will be a faster path to banning them from DNF.
If this isn't make policy, can we AT LEAST be allowed to post a warning in any thread where a domain being sold has fake or hidden WHOIS? Allowing scams here hurts everyone.
If you ask me, allowing MEMBERS to publicly flag sales threads with "questionable" or private whois would inevitably invite troll/flame. Perhaps you can simply REPORT them.
Personally, I don't like blatantly false whois either; but whois privacy is so common these days that if sellers are required to take that off in order to sell their domains HERE (DNForum), I'm afraid it would effect some backlash.
Profoundly influenced by #Bauhaus, Nameslave unrepentantly embraces Minimalism in his #multimedia portfolio. His early works include an experimental adaptation of Chekhov’s Cherry Orchard using the #Minimalist method inspired at least partly by the music of Robert Fripp. His totally irrelevant M.Ed. dissertation examines Organizational Culture and Change Management.
Bookmarks