This is not a GEO + Keyword domain

**thevirtual** · 09-10-2009, 12:18 PM

I don't see how it makes sense filling the GEO + Keyword forum with all domains that weren't "good enough" for the GEO domains section. Most of these are not GEO + Keyword domains anyway.

Some examples:
SanJuanPR . net
RegionSyddanmark . com

These are names of GEO locations. They do not include keywords.

I guess the point is to make the GEO sales section better quality while using the GEO + Keyword section to fill with all the rest of the "junk"?

**Gerry** · 09-10-2009, 12:30 PM

I like your examples.

**biggedon** · 09-10-2009, 12:42 PM

Originally Posted by thevirtual

I guess the point is to make the GEO sales section better quality while using the GEO + Keyword section to fill with all the rest of the "junk"?

if that is the reason, then it's is a good one

imo...

**thevirtual** · 09-10-2009, 12:59 PM

Originally Posted by biggedon

if that is the reason, then it's is a good one

imo...

My point is that this is contradictory. Also notice how I put "junk" in quotations.

**thevirtual** · 09-11-2009, 01:18 PM

Originally Posted by Doc Com

I like your examples.

An exact name of a region and a capital city domain which includes country code. These are not GEO + keyword domains, they are GEO domains.

**Acro** · 09-11-2009, 01:20 PM

I propose a new method: if it's in Google Earth, it's a geo domain

**biggedon** · 09-11-2009, 02:58 PM

Originally Posted by thevirtual

My point is that this is contradictory. Also notice how I put "junk" in quotations.

i noticed... but all domains in Geo + keyword section may not be junk.

maybe that's just your opinion.

Originally Posted by thevirtual

An exact name of a region and a capital city domain which includes country code. These are not GEO + keyword domains, they are GEO domains.

i don't think it really matters where you put them, if they don't sell.

an exact name of a region, without including the word "region", could be considered a Geo.

and sanjuanpr could mean sanjuan public restrooms.

if it was in the Geo section and didn't sell, then got moved to the Geo + keyword section and still hasn't sold, then maybe it has no appeal.

most people complain about how their domain gets moved, that they "feel" is a Geo.

when imo, they may be trying catch an unknowing buyer into "thinking" they are purchasing a genuine Geo domain, because it is listed in that section.

that could be an underlying issue.

or the maybe the real issue is that the OP who starts a thread in that section does not know what a genuine Geo domain is, so they just post there because they see some other names there like theirs.

when you get a real geo you'll know, because there will be plenty of offers.

imo...

**thevirtual** · 09-11-2009, 03:04 PM

Originally Posted by biggedon

i noticed... but all domains in Geo + keyword section may not be junk.

maybe that's just your opinion.

i don't think it really matters where you put them, if they don't sell.

an exact name of a region, without including the word "region", could be considered a Geo.

and sanjuanpr could mean sanjuan public restrooms.

if it was in the Geo section and didn't sell, then got moved to the Geo + keyword section and still hasn't sold, then maybe it has no appeal.

most people complain about how their domain gets moved, that they "feel" is a Geo.

when imo, they may be trying catch an unknowing buyer into "thinking" they are purchasing a genuine Geo domain, because it is listed in that section.

that could be an underlying issue.

or the maybe the real issue is that the OP who starts a thread in that section does not know what a genuine Geo domain is, so they just post there because they see some other names there like theirs.

when you get a real geo you'll know, because there will be plenty of offers.

imo...

Still trying to boost your own ego by putting down other members?

I have sold tons of GEO domains my friend.

**biggedon** · 09-11-2009, 03:55 PM

Originally Posted by thevirtual

Still trying to boost your own ego by putting down other members?

I have sold tons of GEO domains my friend.

lol

so once again you're gonna try and make me the bad guy.

but you had no problem putting down other members names, when you labeled all the domains in Geo+ keyword section as "junk"... did you?

those days of using me as the scapegoat are over and done!

from now on, you, your posts, along with your domains, will have to stand on their own.

imo...

**thevirtual** · 09-11-2009, 04:06 PM

Originally Posted by biggedon

lol

so once again you're gonna try and make me the bad guy.

but you had no problem putting down other members names, when you labeled all the domains in Geo+ keyword section as "junk"... did you?

those days of using me as the scapegoat are over and done!

from now on, you, your posts, along with your domains, will have to stand on their own.

imo...

You missed the point. I used the word "junk" to refer to what you consider these domains. You are the one who is calling all domains "junk" which do not fit your qualifications to be included in the GEO section.

**Gerry** · 09-11-2009, 04:51 PM

Getting back to your original post. Re-reading, I am a little confused:

Originally Posted by thevirtual

Most of these are not GEO + Keyword domains anyway.

Some examples:
SanJuanPR . net
RegionSyddanmark . com

These are names of GEO locations. They do not include keywords.

Are you saying that SanJuanPR is not a GEO?

And that they are not a GEO because of no keyword?

Even though San Juan PR IS THE KEYWORD?

**Acro** · 09-11-2009, 04:57 PM

Doc, I think PR is not a keyword as in "Public Relations", it's as in "Puerto Rico". So I'd loosely categorize it as a geo domain, e.g. OrlandoFL would be a valid geo domain.

**Gerry** · 09-11-2009, 05:04 PM

Originally Posted by Acro

Doc, I think PR is not a keyword as in "Public Relations", it's as in "Puerto Rico". So I'd loosely categorize it as a geo domain, e.g. OrlandoFL would be a valid geo domain.

That is what I was getting at...SanJuanPR says San Juan Puerto Rico, as an understood abbreviation for PR, when combined with San Juan.

**biggedon** · 09-11-2009, 05:06 PM

Originally Posted by thevirtual

You missed the point. I used the word "junk" to refer to what you consider these domains. You are the one who is calling all domains "junk" which do not fit your qualifications to be included in the GEO section.

i think you have no point, and again you're trying to point at me to be your fall guy.

you started this thread, not me.

i didn't use the word junk to describe any domains in that section, you did.

nor did i state that domains that don't fit my qualifications of a Geo domain, to be junk.

i think you need to learn how to "read and interpret" with clarity, what others actually say, vs. what you want to accuse them of saying.

don't get it twisted...

**Acro** · 09-11-2009, 05:14 PM

Don, you didn't add "imo" this time

**biggedon** · 09-11-2009, 05:26 PM

Originally Posted by Acro

Don, you didn't add "imo" this time

even when i do put the "imo", some still get all upset

it's just my opinion and if it don't mean much, then why get so pissed?

imo...

**thevirtual** · 09-11-2009, 05:55 PM

Originally Posted by biggedon

i think you have no point, and again you're trying to point at me to be your fall guy.

you started this thread, not me.

i didn't use the word junk to describe any domains in that section, you did.

nor did i state that domains that don't fit my qualifications of a Geo domain, to be junk.

i think you need to learn how to "read and interpret" with clarity, what others actually say, vs. what you want to accuse them of saying.

don't get it twisted...

You said something to that effect in the other thread.

**PRED** · 10-23-2009, 04:36 PM

.

**loudbeats.com** · 10-24-2009, 02:38 AM

Everyone has their opinion, so why not respect it and let mods do their job.. move on whoever has problem with it, hope that makes world a better place!!