View Single Post
Old 04-29-2009, 07:40 AM   #11 (permalink)
marcorandazza
Platinum Lifetime Member
No Avatar
 
Name: Marc J. Randazza
Last Online: 11-16-2009 08:31 PM
iTrader: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 262
DNF$: 10
Location: San Diego

Send a message via AIM to marcorandazza

Quote:
Having been represented both complainants and respondents in dozens of proceedings at both,there's not a huge world of difference, except under the circumstances I've noted above, and with NAF having an edge on speed.
I have found that the $150 you save on an initial filing at NAF is *rapidly* wiped out by inconsistent chickensh*t decisions by their flunkies. NAF allows its uneducated flunkies to make decisions that only panelists are supposed to make (for example, language of the proceeding).

When I represent complainants, I only use WIPO. WIPO is a little slower, that is true, but I'd rather wait two extra weeks and have the job done right.
__________________
Marc J. Randazza
The Legal Satyricon
No post should be considered to be legal advice.
marcorandazza is offline   Reply With Quote