Forget 2006, here nor there to anything I am looking at.
As of July 2nd 2008, whois indicates Stephane Pacaud as the owner.
Are you stating Stephane Pacaud sold this name in July/08 to Ant.com Limited ?
That would mean the complaintant is flat out telling a lie he spoke with Pacaud after that date in regards to the name ?
That would also mean it is bad timing that after discussions ( that really didnt happen ) the name is sold to a HK company before the wipo is filed ?
Look there's a duck, no thats not a duck, but it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, no no duck that's a dog.
At any rate John it was a win, congrats. It isnt unreasonable to think someone who has lost wipo's in the past would even consider moving a name to HK when they
Quote:
|
felt this coming from a mile away.
|
. Just a coincidence is all.... congrats to the new owner of Ant.com and having to defend the name within 6 months of owning it and assuming he paid in excess of 2006's $240k, Id be pissed.