Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegendaryJP  Its somewhat of a moot point for netsol as either way someone would have been upset at the decision. |
And there you go. Someone is going to be unhappy no matter what happened,
but a a choice had to be urgently made in that given moment.
As business_man said, being sued is one thing NetSol wanted to avoid. That's
not necessarily wrong, though that probably depends on the situation and how
the possibly affected party views it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_man I would NOT do that. |
And some people wonder why some registrars would not do that either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by business_man Back to the very original example of the cc.com dispute at NetSol - If an owner has a domain name, and transfers it away to a different registrar, which registrar would give them the strongest protection when it comes to a previous registrant "claiming" that their domain name was stolen. Clearly if it was "stolen" then the police should be involved to gather the appropriate "evidence" that it was actually stolen and not just sold rashly. |
By strongest protection, you mean who would work to try to get it back? The
owner ought to talk to the registrar where they intended the domain name to
stay with.
But if you're really referring to what registrar can realistically guarantee they'll
not do what's discussed here, there's none. It's case to case.