Quote:
Originally posted by gmartfin
First off I am a viagra affiliate with permission to use their trademarks. Viagra only goes after those who abuse them such as sending them to porn sites.
Merrilllynch had a go round with me 15 months ago and lost.
Go to the site and you'll see how I beat them.
I have one of the best domain lawyers in the practise (Howard Neu) and listen very very carefully to him. |
Interesting that viagra would affiliate itself with a typo, but if it works, it works.
As for Merril Lynch, I wonder what you mean by a "go round"...not UDRP, obviously...is this an issue that was taken to civil court, or was it just a bigfoot letter followed by correspondence?
And by the way, Howard doesn't win every case...remember fisher.com?
Miles
P.S. And anyone who knows domain "law"--UDRP, ACPA and Lapham--knows the domains I pointed out are risky, TM-wise. Sounds like you got lucky. But I definitely wouldn't count on such luck in similar situations...and I think the historical outcomes of "domain law" battles support this.