View Single Post
Old 02-29-2008, 05:52 PM   #14 (permalink)
EJS
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
EJS's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 11:01 PM
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,970
DNF$: 1,042
Location: Manhattan, NYC
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by Prospecting View Post
always focused on generic domains.

never dabbled with anything that could/would infringe.
With all due respect, I don't think you grasp this Bill. Based on what I have been reading, generic and geographic domain names could now be taken. Injunctions can be ordered without cause. If Bill's Widget Company seeks an injunction from the AG for Widget.com because it is confusing people, they might just get it. The financial penalties are so high, the business risk could be too high. This is serious shit.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DomainsInc View Post
If you think its that easy you should look into some past wipo cases that should of been open and shut but instead lost the domain. Anyways, this would only effect those in the states.
Since it would effect only US based companies, and since Verisign (the central registry) is located in the US, I understand it will effect .com and .net names no matter where you are (according to a comment from Ron J. on my blog).
__________________
Lowell

Last edited by EJS; 02-29-2008 at 05:53 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
EJS is offline   Reply With Quote