View Single Post
Old 03-19-2008, 05:42 PM   #15 (permalink)
kylewill
DNF Member
 
Last Online: Yesterday 03:19 PM
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 352
DNF$: 3,812


Many SEO professionals get annoyed by these theories being perpetuated on the Internet because potential clients get bad information resulting in sloppy business.

I've been doing SEO pre-Google, since 1997 and have relied entirely on organic rankings which yield multiple Christmas season affiliate sales in the $500-$600k range. When areas like these are believed (the -950 penalty, TLD preference, etc.), part of me is annoyed, and part of me happy that much of my competition is still so far behind.

I have no proof, only logic. But I'm fairly confident this has been officially responded to by Google or Matt Cutts recently, I just don't have the post right now to prove it. Between Google Groups, Matt Cutts blogs, Search Engine conferences, and Google Webmaster Q&A section... there is a LOT of areas to dig for official responses.
__________________
Kyle
kylewill is offline   Reply With Quote