| "I don't understand why just because it contains maybe fake names and not attorney terms it's funny."
Well, if you do a whois on the domain names in the "sample" agreement, it doesn't look like it is all fake data in that "sample" agreement. Rodney Brittain is, in fact, the registrant of nbfaa.com, and a quick search on "Dan Jacquish" certainly does turn up someone by that name who is in the burglar alarm business.
They aren't fake names.
I'd be curious to know what google search terms turned up that agreement, since I don't seem to be able to put together unique terms which appear in that text. For example, while "Dan Jacquish" turns up hits relating to some burglar alarm guy, the search "Dan Jacquish domain" comes up empty.
I'll try one last time....
"What's funny is that someone posted that agreement, including the confidentiality clause, where it can be found with Google."
Usually when two people such as Rodney Brittain (who is the actual registrant of nbfaa.com) and Dan Jacquish (who is actually in the National Burglar and Fire Alarm Association) enter into an agreement, and that agreement says that it is "confidential", then you don't expect to see copies of the agreement floating around the internet.
You certainly don't expect to find 'confidential' agreements by poking around on Google, although I can't seem to replicate any Google search that would turn up that document.
I guess I just find humor in unexpected things.... but when you find a "confidential" agreement posted on the internet, then it's usually a sign that a major bonehead has been busy.
__________________
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
|