| To suggest that someone ripping off an article doesn't know any better is to suggest that this person is mentally deficient in some way. But he or she is not so mentally deficient as to be unable to make 'a quick buck' from someone else's work. Ignorance is no defence in law. I would have thought that pointing out that stealing an article is no different from stealing a domain name would mean something to a domaining thief, if anything would. I'm not sure how this has worked for you. How can you 'put it in a way that means something to the thief' before your work has been stolen, or when you don't know who is stealing it or going to steal it?
__________________ Beware of my advice - I'm still a newbie.  |