Look, I enjoy busting John's balls from time to time, but there is no way in hell you're going to get away with trying to question his integrity on this issue. The case is a public record. You gave away enough information about it that a chimpanzee could have found out which case it was. There isn't a shade of impropriety in what John did. Even if he magically knew you didn't want it disclosed, he was under no obligation whatsoever to keep that public information under wraps.
Not reading a decision that you gripe about? Are you kidding? You have "other business afoot"??? You paid a lawyer to take a case to court to challenge the ruling in another case that you haven't even read?
Quote:
WIPO decisions are not based on evidence that has been heard from both sides and in many cases is not true (b) that it is quoted as being "fact" when it is in fact
"assumption"
|
How do you know? You haven't even READ the decision? Which, your "other business afoot" aside, you don't need to be a speed reader to read that decision in less than 10 minutes. Give me a break. You're just making yourself look dumber and dumber.
Read the freakin' decision or shut your trap about it.