View Single Post
Old 04-21-2009, 11:47 AM   #18 (permalink)
Onward
 
Onward's Avatar
 
Last Online: Today 12:10 PM
iTrader: (45)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,051
DNF$: 15,826
Location: Washington DC
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by marcorandazza View Post
Really?

Why don't you take a look at 15 USC s 1129 and tell me if it is not illegal.

And to answer the original poster's question, yes, these people could combine forces and file a claim under 15 USC 1129 and most likely prevail. They will probably only get the domain name plus their attorneys' fees, as I can't see what true damages they could prove.

http://randazza.wordpress.com/2005/0...r-individuals/



No, this is a really bad idea.

Under the UDRP, panelists are very unpredictable when it comes to personal names. Under 15 USC 1129, the path to victory is relatively clear.

Wasting $1500 on a filing fee to most likely lose is not that great of a move. Plus, under 1129, they can get their attorneys fees back from the guy.
What ???? Did you read my post? Please try reading it before commenting.
__________________
.

Find out who is sending that anonymous offer...
Search their e-mail address across over 40 social & business networking sites, blogs and forums.
Onward is offline   Reply With Quote