View Single Post
Old 07-02-2009, 08:23 PM   #18 (permalink)
condoleezza
Exclusive Lifetime Member
 
condoleezza's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 06:35 PM
iTrader: (25)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
DNF$: 3,726
Location: england


Steve Austin. I remember him also. $6m also comes to mind.

Anyway, my whole point is that i did not steel it and i did not get it for free. It was up for sale and i bought it. Anyine else could have bought it, including Chandler, but they decided not to. So i bought it and i am advertising it for sale to anyone who wants it. Another domain buyer, chandler or a chandler fan or fan site. It is up for auction at $60, which is less than i paid for it. I can't force anyone to buy it, but at least the opportunity is there to do so if they wish. If i make a profit from someone who wants the domain more than i do then thats all well and good in my eyes, and if no one wants it then i will lose what i paid for it. To me, thats fair and equal. If i was trying to hold chandler to some sort of enormous profit, or i bought it with that intent, then yes i would agree it would be cybersquatting and unethical. There maybe other less know kyle chandlers out there who would love to own the domain. I trust you will appreciate more where i am coming from now and i will end with good luck with your dealings and kind regards.

George

Quote:
Originally Posted by goodguyy View Post
Condelezza i am not condeming you , I was just expressing my opinion. Thats why I didnt want to keep posting my opinion. If I kept repeating it it would appear I was doing that and I was just giving my and only my opinion.

But on the two topics

If M Jackson name was reg fee and Kyle Chandler doesn't seem to want the domain, so seems a waste not to use it as Bionic posted. ( By the way , the bionic man was my favorite show as a child) that is the same exact excuse I always see on Judge Judy. Someone steals something from someone and then the excuse is :Well they didnt need it , and I did so I took it" . Just becasue someone doesnt need something does not make it right to take something . If thats the case I might was well take some of your domains you havent done anything with in years. "You look like you dont need them".
Wrong is wrong. I wouldnt take MichealJackson.com for free. Why would I take something I know it wrong. That would be like if someone said , heres a free car I stole. I would run as fast as I can. Again wrong is still wrong no matter what ya do to justify it.
__________________
HA.biz F UCKA.com - in live sedo auction now
condoleezza is offline   Reply With Quote