View Single Post
Old 03-04-2008, 08:17 PM   #25 (permalink)
H2FC
Platinum Lifetime Member
 
H2FC's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 12:40 PM
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,535
DNF$: 790
Location: MyGreenDomains
Country:


Quote:
Originally Posted by GoPC View Post
Look again at the "evidence" you are basing your assumptions one. While they certainly carry s similar pattern, laying the two graphs directly on top of one another CLEARLY SHOWS that temperature and CO2 rises were separated by many years (in some cases nearly 1500 years) that that CO2 increase ALWAYS FOLLOWED an increase in Global Temperature.

NOT THE OTHER WAY 'ROUND.

MMGW is a hoax and the people responsible for proliferating this hoax actually provide the proof of that hoax.

The real question here is do you WANT to believe we are killing the planet?

For some, the question is absolutely "YES". For many, it's a new Religion. For others, it's the path to financial or political gain. For others, they just want to believe in something... so this will do.

Whatever the reason, it's ridiculous and once you boil away all the hype, the fundamental argument of MMGW that "co2 causes Global Warming" is proven WRONG by the very same 425,000 years of data they use.

It's as simple as that folks. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors... alot of distraction, but the bottom line is that the CORE of their contention is flawed and THEY'VE proved that.

So can we believe ANYTHING they say?

No.

GoPC
It would be helpful if you could tell us where you acquired all the scientific climate change education you have that allows you to override the assertions of over 90% of the worlds foremost top climate scientists. How many years of study do you have in this field and from where did you graduate?

Also, since you are rebuking the great majority of the qualified and respected climate scientist in the world where will you get the necessary majority peer review to back up your findings?
__________________
Each day we dump over 70 million tons of co2 pollution into our thin shell atmosphere from burning fossil fuels. This cannot continue.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/tr..._data_mlo.html
H2FC is offline   Reply With Quote