Quote:
Originally Posted by DNWizardX9  the point is the content is on the .com not the .mobi as it is simply a redirect |
But... they are using a .mobi to advertise it to the public.
Which is the part of the argument for .mobi = yes it's a mobile site
foxnews.mobi = fox mobile site
wap.foxnews.proteus.com = this is our long url that is actually our mobile website but you will never remember it when you see it in a print ad, or if you hear it spoken out loud, so we'll just use the .mobi
proteus seems to be the company that developed the site for Fox, so I would think Fox would put this site on their own domain eventually, maybe the .mobi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acroplex .mobi is hype because it's a moot TLD: content does not depend on the TLD. |
We know any extension can be used for mobile but the public will just see
.mobi = mobile
Similar to how .com came out first and everyone got used to that, .mobi will be perceived to be for mobile, if they brand it right.