| What a comedy!
how Complainant could apparently have been using, in 1996, a domain name which was not registered until 1997, and when it itself did not exist until1997.
have been attempting to acquire the domain name since 2006, and suggests that, since it was apparently unable to obtain the domain name at that time, Complainant then proceeded to obtain registration of the trademark ANT in the United States in 2008.
Seriously, this is one of the most plainly stated and argued decisions I have read in a very long time.
It is an excellent study of the entire process and covers point by point the complete process.
My congrats to you for a successful defense and congrats to whomever dictated and composed this brief.
__________________ 
Conservative With A Conscience |