Quote:
Originally Posted by biggedon  Hi
here's my personal, "non-moderator opinion"
publicity and exposure is good for your domain!
some of you members who complain about spiders and all that need to quit it.
in reality, most of the domains you're trying to hide ain't worth all that
and in fact, they probably need all the exposure they can get!
i've seen some of the sorriest names being posted for both appraisal and for sale and the OP tries to camouflage the name in the title.
do you really think the past owners of prominent domain sales cared whether or not their name got indexed, botted or spidered?
hell no, because in the end, they are only going to sell if the price is right.
and that's the confidence you gotta have or learn to get/show when trying to sell or responding to offers.
don't keep blaming the forum and title qualifications for your failure to get the most for your domains.
imnmo.. |
ditto, especially regarding the desire to hide from the SE's so many worhless or semi-wothless domains (which need max exposure).
p.s. I did not see the evidence the name was indexed in G based on the dnf thread in the original post. I still question if the SE really know what example(.)tld or example(dot)tld is? BTW, exampleDOTtld seems like a real good way to make it tougher to get indexed, but the question is why bother to do so when 90% or more of the names are of no or little value anyway and indexing may help them sell? An issue with ExampleDOT format is confusion with the Gov Dept of Transportation (DOT common abbreviation) where there are a number of domains with that meaning such as StateDOT.org for example?