Exactly, even imo the threat of action is enough. Imagine I negotiate sale with a buyer, that buyer then says no thanks, we believ we have a rioght to the name and will exercise that route. To me even that is enough. To then turn around and dump the name is disgusting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dotNetKing  I feel for you and entirely agree with feelings towards NameJet.com.
> You then receive a udrp notice for the domain shortly there after
Are you implying that you registered the domain name in bad faith, knowing that the company who contacted you had a trademark on the name and intending to sell it to them for a price beyond your out of pocket costs, and or deliberately/knowingly putting content on the domain name that infringed their trademark?
If you didn't register the domain name in bad faith, and especially if you are able to prove this, wouldn't the company be wasting their money on UDRP, even if they do have a trademark on the exact name?
I have had UDRP threatened several times, but I have tenaciously stuck to the fact that I did not register the domain name in bad faith.
Mind you, most of the names were reg fee to US$100, which is different from your case. |
No my name but...
the winner got a udrp shortly after as they were already moving in that direction as far as I am told.
Further on aving to defend that name while the the auction company already knew a problem existed or may exist based on its communication with the complaintant is a kick in the face.