| I do. The respondent was a scumbag who registered a domain name, not for its generic value, but to divert customers from a mark holder to its competitors. Cabell is an absolute disgrace. At least Sorkin occasionally tries to "make it look good."
I don't think these dissents have any value to anyone except Ms. Cabell, who issued them more likely to wave her arms around so that more scumbags will pick her as a panelist - thus supplementing her public-interest income with a few more $750 checks for serving as a panelist.
She should stick to her creative commons work. Despite my absolute venom for her as a UDRP panelist, she's my hero when it comes to copyright issues.
__________________
Marc J. Randazza The Legal Satyricon
No post should be considered to be legal advice.
|