Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLegendaryJP  See that right now is a moot point because, even if a tm name it does not negate namejets actions, if not a tm it goes without saying the winner is now having to defend his purchase. Clearly not coincidently this name was auctioned, it was done to avoid an issue with a complaintant and cash in while they could. I have heard this tale from 3 others today alone. The actions of the winning bidder is secondary imo, if they are served a wipo/udrp/c&d etc after winning a name that is part of the cost of business they take on and knowingly so. It is another issue when a auction company auctions of the name they KNOW will face a notice. |
I am not trying to defend namejet. Namejet should have notified all bidders in the auction. This is what snapnames does. I have received many times emails from snapnames saying "proceed at your own risk, we can remove you from the auction if you want".
I asking to understand if the domain is "defendable".