| The respondent failed to respond twice! It's no wonder they lost...
When it comes to UDRP, non reply is far more of a risk than non usage; however that's defined, which isn't clear, as past rulings have shown...
In my view, so called non-usage becomes a large focus when the complainant's case is weak, and the panalist is grasping at straws to rule the "right way" for the complaintant, who afterall is who selected the arbitration provider and is paying the entire bill (for single panalist; most respondents don't know / can't afford to opt for a 3 party panal).
Ron
__________________ Domagon Consulting Services - Business Help and Problem Solving
SeedCash.com - sow those economic green shoots. Make An Offer! |