| Was the new registrant was named as the respondent in the UDRP complaint?
If NameJet was, then the matter is relatively simple ... they obviously sold "damaged" goods and needs to refund.
However, based on what I've read so far, NameJet may have known there was a potential TM issue, BUT the actual UDRP complaint was addressed to the new registrant who won the auction...
In which case, NameJet, while unethical, could choose to wash its hands of the issue and basically do nothing.
The new registrant could attempt to go after NameJet for selling a domain that it knew had TM issues - and might prevail ... and believe there have been cases of that type already in which the current registrant who runs into UDRP issues sues the previous registrant for knowledge of TM problems without full disclosure.
Ron
__________________ Domagon Consulting Services - Business Help and Problem Solving SeedCash.com - sow those economic green shoots. Make An Offer! |