Originally Posted by jberryhill

His name is Pedro, and I keep him in a desk drawer. Whenever a UDRP response is needed, we apply cardio-shock electrodes to him, and dang can that boy respond to a UDRP.



Cases that should lose, should lose.



That's because UDRP decisions are self-justifying. You assume that the summary in the decision is an accurate reflection of what was filed in the complaint and the response.

What you aren't taking into account is that the person summarizing the facts is also the person issuing the decision.

Compare these two outcomes:

zero.org:

http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/...ons/938092.htm
B. Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding.
...
Accordingly, it is Ordered that the <zero.org> domain name be TRANSFERRED from Respondent to Complainant.

zero.us:
http://domains.adrforum.com/domains/...ons/938180.htm

Having established only one of the three elements required under the U. S. Department of Commerce’s usTLD Dispute Resolution Policy, the Panel concludes that relief shall be DENIED.

Now, clearly Pedro could have helped out on the zero.org case, but there's only so many things a comatose midget can do.