View Single Post
Old 06-04-2008, 05:53 PM   #7 (permalink)
jberryhill
Philadelphia Lawyer
 
jberryhill's Avatar
 
Last Online: Yesterday 04:52 AM
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,389
DNF$: 3,327


Quote:
I think the OP is referring to sites like YouTube.com, who services are limited to the web-site itself. Assuming they would like (if they haven't already) to TM their name, how would they go about it.
You are missing the point, actually a couple of points here.

If I was using blah.com as a website at which people shared photos, then I'm certainly providing a service.

The question is what am I using as a mark. Consider the following scenarios:

1. You could go to www.blah.com, and I could have a page there saying "Welcome to JohnnyB's Photo House" and no mention of either "BLAH" or "BLAH.COM" on the web site. In that situation I am not using either BLAH or BLAH.COM as a mark on or in connection with the service. I am using "JohnnyB's Photo House" as a mark for the service.

2. You could go to www.blah.com and I could have a page there saying "Welcome to the Blah photo sharing service". In that case, I am using "BLAH" as a mark for a photo sharing service.

3. You could go to www.blah.com and I could have a page there saying "Welcome to the Blah.com photo sharing service". In that case, I am using "Blah.com" as a mark for a photo sharing service.

Your attempted distinction of "services limited to the website itself" is a distraction.

Read Section II of this:

http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac...s/guide299.htm

And then come back here and explain In re Eilberg in your own words.
__________________
John Berryhill Ph.d., esq.
John-AT-johnberryhill.com
Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly.
jberryhill is offline   Reply With Quote