DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars - View Single Post - Person Cybersquatting People's Names

**Crown** · 04-16-2009, 09:38 PM

Thanks for your input. I appreciate it always when anyone has anything to add

The person is trying to sell the names for profit. This is expressly against the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. However, I do not want to even explore that part so lets assume its completely irrelevant. I would just like to stick to the issue on ICAAN assuming we have what we need to go to a dispute. Asking domainers a way to fight a domainer may ruffle some feathers, hit close to home, and can easily go off topic, haha. So just to save the topic from going astray to a different issue:

With respect to the $1,500 fee, ICAAN - WIPO (not a court of law), can plaintiffs file a dispute together for all their various names for same price so long as it is the same defendant?

Ex. There are many cases in which one company pays same price for many different urls against the same defendant (ex. read the lego case which was just posted).

Thanks again to all who posted and anyone out there with the answer.

04-16-2009, 09:38 PM	#8 (permalink)
Crown Last Online: 11-18-2009 06:46 PM iTrader: (1) Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 99 DNF$: 33 Location: US	Thanks for your input. I appreciate it always when anyone has anything to add The person is trying to sell the names for profit. This is expressly against the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. However, I do not want to even explore that part so lets assume its completely irrelevant. I would just like to stick to the issue on ICAAN assuming we have what we need to go to a dispute. Asking domainers a way to fight a domainer may ruffle some feathers, hit close to home, and can easily go off topic, haha. So just to save the topic from going astray to a different issue: With respect to the $1,500 fee, ICAAN - WIPO (not a court of law), can plaintiffs file a dispute together for all their various names for same price so long as it is the same defendant? Ex. There are many cases in which one company pays same price for many different urls against the same defendant (ex. read the lego case which was just posted). Thanks again to all who posted and anyone out there with the answer.