Quote:
Originally Posted by draggar  Go ask Sam Adams Boston Lager. :(
Edit: At least it was rejected - I would have called for reverse hijacking. The complainant made no research to see if the respondent had any legit claims to the name - they just jumped ahead and filed a WIPO. |
Calling for RDNH in a UDRP case is stupid and ego masturbation by the lawyer.
Why?
UDRP has no right to a reply brief. However, MANY panelists allow a reply if the complainant is accused of RDNH.
But, if you get an RDNH ruling, what do you actually win? NOTHING.
It feels good to get one. You get bragging rights. But you win absolutely nothing, yet you open the door to a supplemental filing being accepted.