slobizman, in response to your off-topic rant....
I agree, we can't affect our surroundings.
Just as we certainly didn't erraticate countless species over the last 125 years.
Just as we didn't clear cut millions of acres of old growth forest over the last 125 years.
Just as we certainly couldn't have affected the atmosphere and the o-zone layer by pumping trillions and trillions of tons of particulate into it over the last 125 years.
Just as we couldn't have polluted parts of the ocean by dumping trillions of tons of refuse into it over the last 125 years.
Just as we couldn't have polluted rivers and streams by oozing, leaking and piping industrial solvents and chemicals into them at one point producing rivers that are able to "burn" or catch on fire.
Nope...we can't affect our surroundings, we live in a perfect little vacuum where we can do anything we'd like and not face the consequences.
I'm glad you helped all of us understand that.
So many of us just want to continue living in our own little bubbles without any accountability whatsover.
It's the best part of today's society. Everything is always someone else's fault, or better yet, if you can't see it or feel it - it doesn't even exist!
Quote:
Originally Posted by slobizman  Very intellectual response. Al Gore is a fraud. "Scientists" only pretend that people cause global warming for get grant money. Open your eyes. Think for yourself. 55% of scientists admit man does not cause global warming. They are the brave ones who aren't after funding, or who think it's worth speaking out over.
BTW, how the heck did the earth warm in the past without man's industry? Why was it warmer in the 1930's than now? Why has Nasa recanted their "warmest days" findings? Why has the media made virtually no mention it of it. Why do the very high level scientists form MIT I meet at MIT meetings laugh at this preposterous "conclusion" of their peers seeking funding? I could go on and on, but I'm sure your kindergarten teacher has already brainwashed you to save the planet form certain extinction.
If you need any more indication of the lies, what the heck does Al Gore's film of lies deserve a Nobel "Peace" Prize? What does that have to do with peace? It should be the Nobel "Nation Wealth Distribution Attempt" Prize. But, hell, he's in good company: the terrorist Arafat and the fool/coward Jimmy Carter who ushered in the Islamic Revolution.
Peace brother. As Sheryl Crow says, only one ply of toilet paper, maybe two if it's really messy. Save the world buddy. I'd appreciate it. |