DNForum - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars - View Single Post

**jberryhill** · 04-02-2009, 09:00 AM

OnlineNIC is currently under a court injunction preventing them from transferring any domains out. They are lying to you.

Since the 33M judgment, Verizon has moved to seize ON's accreditation and have it transferred to a receiver.

As soon as they moved to do that, suddenly for the first time, an attorney for ON showed up in the case, claiming that ON had no notice of the original proceeding, which went on for several months.

The judge scheduled a hearing on the receivership and the motion to set aside the judgment, and then ON moved a couple of ten thousand domain names to another Chinese registrar.

Verizon noticed this and went to court to obtain an emergency injunction preventing ON from moving out any more domains.

That stuff about them "changing" their transfer terms is bullshit, and SnapNames shouldn't be doing business with them in the first place.

I'd like to know when, exactly, you won the auction.

If Snapnames is still using ON, then there is a US revenue stream that can be seized.

04-02-2009, 09:00 AM	#9 (permalink)
jberryhill Philadelphia Lawyer Last Online: 09-18-2009 01:17 AM iTrader: (1) Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 2,987 DNF$: 6,350	OnlineNIC is currently under a court injunction preventing them from transferring any domains out. They are lying to you. Since the 33M judgment, Verizon has moved to seize ON's accreditation and have it transferred to a receiver. As soon as they moved to do that, suddenly for the first time, an attorney for ON showed up in the case, claiming that ON had no notice of the original proceeding, which went on for several months. The judge scheduled a hearing on the receivership and the motion to set aside the judgment, and then ON moved a couple of ten thousand domain names to another Chinese registrar. Verizon noticed this and went to court to obtain an emergency injunction preventing ON from moving out any more domains. That stuff about them "changing" their transfer terms is bullshit, and SnapNames shouldn't be doing business with them in the first place. I'd like to know when, exactly, you won the auction. If Snapnames is still using ON, then there is a US revenue stream that can be seized. __________________ John Berryhill Ph.d., esq. John-AT-johnberryhill.com Please do not send private messages via dnforum.com, email me directly. Last edited by jberryhill; 04-02-2009 at 09:02 AM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost