Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
ICANN threatening acronyms and other desirable domain names
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GeorgeK" data-source="post: 2206827" data-attributes="member: 357"><p>It looks like the GNSO Council ignored (or didn't read!) the public comments, and simply went ahead with the initiation of a PDP:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140605-2" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140605-2</a></p><p></p><p>If you read the "whereas" section, it's very one-sided, by ICANN staff.</p><p></p><p>The GNSO council did not even pretend to analyze things deeply, only actually discussing the topic in a limited fashion the same day as the vote itself!</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16254.html" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16254.html</a></p><p></p><p>i.e. that post above is June 5, same as the vote, and if you look at:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/index.html" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/index.html</a></p><p></p><p>there were no council discussions on the mailing list prior to that date. Even Avri Doria said:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16256.html" target="_blank">http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16256.html</a></p><p></p><p>"Also has there been any in depth discussion in the council of the charter yet. I don't recall it"</p><p></p><p>Seems like the usual ICANN games continue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GeorgeK, post: 2206827, member: 357"] It looks like the GNSO Council ignored (or didn't read!) the public comments, and simply went ahead with the initiation of a PDP: [url]http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140605-2[/url] If you read the "whereas" section, it's very one-sided, by ICANN staff. The GNSO council did not even pretend to analyze things deeply, only actually discussing the topic in a limited fashion the same day as the vote itself! [url]http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16254.html[/url] i.e. that post above is June 5, same as the vote, and if you look at: [url]http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/index.html[/url] there were no council discussions on the mailing list prior to that date. Even Avri Doria said: [url]http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16256.html[/url] "Also has there been any in depth discussion in the council of the charter yet. I don't recall it" Seems like the usual ICANN games continue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
General Domain Name Discussion
ICANN threatening acronyms and other desirable domain names
Top
Bottom