Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheLegendaryJP" data-source="post: 1552870" data-attributes="member: 63897"><p>May I add, this is this case. I have been told by other regular buyers it is nothing new and has happened to them where they have learned namejet auctioned off a name only to discover they were just in contact with a supposed tm holder prior to auctioning it off. Each case is unique but it is seeming to be a common practice. </p><p></p><p>Namejet gets warned by tm holder or supposed tm holder, fails to sale them the name and immediatey auctions it off.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He bought on 8/31 and now 3 weeks later was served. He would never known of Namejets prior involvement but the udrp as exhibit names the prior discussion with them as 8/29 !!!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheLegendaryJP, post: 1552870, member: 63897"] May I add, this is this case. I have been told by other regular buyers it is nothing new and has happened to them where they have learned namejet auctioned off a name only to discover they were just in contact with a supposed tm holder prior to auctioning it off. Each case is unique but it is seeming to be a common practice. Namejet gets warned by tm holder or supposed tm holder, fails to sale them the name and immediatey auctions it off. He bought on 8/31 and now 3 weeks later was served. He would never known of Namejets prior involvement but the udrp as exhibit names the prior discussion with them as 8/29 !!!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
Top
Bottom