Forums
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Market
Domains/Websites Wanted
.com Domain Market
gTLD Domain Market
ccTLD Domain Market
Web3 Domain Market
Third-Level Domain Market
Adult Domain Market
What's New
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Account Upgrade
Premium Members Directory
Log in
Register
What's New
calendar
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Enjoy unlimited access to all forum features for FREE! Optional upgrade available for extra perks.
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Domagon" data-source="post: 1553113" data-attributes="member: 5270"><p>Was the new registrant was named as the respondent in the UDRP complaint?</p><p></p><p>If NameJet was, then the matter is relatively simple ... they obviously sold "damaged" goods and needs to refund.</p><p></p><p>However, based on what I've read so far, NameJet may have known there was a potential TM issue, BUT the actual UDRP complaint was addressed to the new registrant who won the auction...</p><p></p><p>In which case, NameJet, while unethical, could choose to wash its hands of the issue and basically do nothing.</p><p></p><p>The new registrant could attempt to go after NameJet for selling a domain that it knew had TM issues - and might prevail ... and believe there have been cases of that type already in which the current registrant who runs into UDRP issues sues the previous registrant for knowledge of TM problems without full disclosure.</p><p></p><p>Ron</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Domagon, post: 1553113, member: 5270"] Was the new registrant was named as the respondent in the UDRP complaint? If NameJet was, then the matter is relatively simple ... they obviously sold "damaged" goods and needs to refund. However, based on what I've read so far, NameJet may have known there was a potential TM issue, BUT the actual UDRP complaint was addressed to the new registrant who won the auction... In which case, NameJet, while unethical, could choose to wash its hands of the issue and basically do nothing. The new registrant could attempt to go after NameJet for selling a domain that it knew had TM issues - and might prevail ... and believe there have been cases of that type already in which the current registrant who runs into UDRP issues sues the previous registrant for knowledge of TM problems without full disclosure. Ron [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Domain Discussion
Domain Name Legal Issues
NAMEJET.com ~WARNING~ Disgusting behaviour!
Top
Bottom