closed "4" and "2"

This thread has been closed by the original author or DNF staff member.
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

telugu

Guest
Would a good generic name be still valuable with prefixes like "4" for "for" or "2" for "to"?
 

Edwin

DNF Addict
Joined
Jun 24, 2002
Messages
1,390
Reaction score
1
Feedback: 22 / 0 / 0
Yes, absolutely!

I bet that 40.com (for-ty) would be good, or 21.com (to-wen-ty-wan)... :)
 

mole

DNF Addict
Joined
May 4, 2002
Messages
6,674
Reaction score
3
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Old economy lingo, ditch it.
 

mole

DNF Addict
Joined
May 4, 2002
Messages
6,674
Reaction score
3
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Originally posted by telugu
no I'm spiderman,you had a nice try though :embarrass

4 (for) and 2 (to) don't hack it today. It's a lousy compromise for a great naming idea. The hype is over, and so to the tolerance for naming flippancy. Just goes 2 show how bad the availability situation was back in 1998 4 addressing. Sheesh.
 

Drewbert

Level 5
Joined
May 6, 2002
Messages
467
Reaction score
0
Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0
>Would a good generic name be still valuable with prefixes like "4" for "for" or "2" for "to"?

No.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom