Would a good generic name be still valuable with prefixes like "4" for "for" or "2" for "to"?
T telugu Guest Jul 13, 2002 #1 Would a good generic name be still valuable with prefixes like "4" for "for" or "2" for "to"?
Edwin DNF Addict Joined Jun 24, 2002 Messages 1,390 Reaction score 1 Feedback: 22 / 0 / 0 Jul 13, 2002 #2 Yes, absolutely! I bet that 40.com (for-ty) would be good, or 21.com (to-wen-ty-wan)...
mole DNF Addict Joined May 4, 2002 Messages 6,674 Reaction score 3 Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0 Jul 13, 2002 #3 Old economy lingo, ditch it.
mole DNF Addict Joined May 4, 2002 Messages 6,674 Reaction score 3 Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0 Jul 13, 2002 #5 Originally posted by telugu no I'm spiderman,you had a nice try though :embarrass Click to expand... 4 (for) and 2 (to) don't hack it today. It's a lousy compromise for a great naming idea. The hype is over, and so to the tolerance for naming flippancy. Just goes 2 show how bad the availability situation was back in 1998 4 addressing. Sheesh.
Originally posted by telugu no I'm spiderman,you had a nice try though :embarrass Click to expand... 4 (for) and 2 (to) don't hack it today. It's a lousy compromise for a great naming idea. The hype is over, and so to the tolerance for naming flippancy. Just goes 2 show how bad the availability situation was back in 1998 4 addressing. Sheesh.
D Drewbert Level 5 Joined May 6, 2002 Messages 467 Reaction score 0 Feedback: 0 / 0 / 0 Jul 14, 2002 #6 >Would a good generic name be still valuable with prefixes like "4" for "for" or "2" for "to"? No.