closed Anyone please appraise these very intersting .com's

[seshidharm]

Originally Posted by seshidharm
STOCKS (stockestimate.com(free with stockestimates.com), talentedinvestor.com, giftedinvestor.com, skillfulinvestor.com, skilfulinvestor.com, stocksuggest.com, stocknotice.com, fairstocks.com, potentstocks.com, stockappraisal.com, stockappraisals.com)

SHOPPING (popularfashions.com, branddiscounts.com, discountbrands.net, brandsavings.info, brandsavings.net, countrywidediscounts.com)

INDUSTRY(indianpharmaceuticals.com, indianbiochemicals.com) JOBS (chinesetechie.com)

TRAVEL & PILGRIMAGE (jerusalemexpress.com, vaticanguide.com, meccaguide.com, meccareport.com)

SHOPPING & STOCKS(cleverpick.com) KIDS (kidsguild.com, kidswit.com, kidspranks.com)
YOGA (yogafacts.com, yogaresorts.com.)

Also, I have brandable names like AMERIPLEDGE.COM, AMERIHOPE.COM and some other(for insurance companies or for companies giving home loans etc. these names are superb. For example, AMERITRADE.COM, AMERISUITES.COM, AMERICARS.COM ARE BIG COMPANIES).

AMERIHOPE.COM, AMERIPLEDGE.COM, BRANDDISCOUNTS.COM, VATICANGUIDE.COM, KIDSGUILD.COM, SKILLFULINVESTOR.COM(SKILFULINVESTOR.COM free), GIFTEDINVESTOR.COM, FAIRSTOCKS.COM, POTENTSTOCKS.COM are some of my favourites.

Meaningful names like these are impossible to find. I am going to keep them all and develop one by one unless I get a very good price.



THANK YOU,
SESHIDHAR(seshidhar_2000@yahoo.com)

 

[geoffe]

I am a rookie at appraisal but I am a long time stock investor and I do not think words like "estimate" "appraisal" "potent" work with investing. I would suggest that reg fee or less on those. For some reason I like vaticanguide. May work well with the Catholics as a tourism thing. reg fee < on the rest.

 

[reyrey]

reg fee for all

 

[seshidharm]

I Don't Think You Understand The Meanings Of Those Domain Names.

 

[David G]

IMO, the best one of the lot is vaticanguide.com as there are a number of guide kind of websites and think some have sold for good money if I recall correctly. Duke may know if so from his DNJ reports.

Sorry, can't see much value or undevelped traffic potential in the others unless I am missing something.

P.S. In response to a PM, yes, many of the names would work well as a developed site with some marketing. I was referring to their values as an undeveloped domain name with little traffic potential unless developed.