Your rational is ridiculous. The 'big players' are not going to blindly place ALL their money on ALL possible WLS subscriptions. It is stupid to believe that. If that were the case, they would already be placing ALL their money on ALL snapbacks, which they are not doing. Yeah, I see you fighting it 'tooth and nail', and you support the rip off registrars like Signature Domains, Namewinner, enom, etc. Those are crooks in this current shame, and Signature and Enom do not even publish their policies on their drop getting policy. That right there tells anyone that Enom and Signature operate backroom bull***t tactics to try to compete. But the likes you claim this is 'fair play' and a 'competive market' at work! Yeah, go ahead and continue to believe that 'auctioning' the following sample of names
Performance.com $12,000+ (Signature Domains)
Rok.com $5,000.00+ (Signature Domains)
Playgirl.com $11,000.00 (Dotster)
Tabloids.com $3,000.00 (Dotster)
Compare.com $5,000.00+ (Dotster)
acts.com $3,000.00+ (Dotster)
is even 'fair' according to ICANN's very own rules of 'bad faith'. Yes, the current system is a total sham. WLS, now and forever. The 'big players' have not beaten me on snapback placements, and they will not beat me on WLS placements, guaranteed.