[B]What are the top sources for real-time domain news?[/B]

[hobo74]

What are the top sources for real-time domain news?

thanks

 

[BidNo]

The most actively updated sources that I know are:

DomainNameWire.com
DnForum (see Domain News)
TheDomains.com
DomainNameNews.com
DnJournal.com (Lowdown)
CircleId.com
DnSalePrice.com (domain sales)
Domaining.com is RSS feed allowing you to look at multiple blogs

 

[DotSauce]

I occasionally publish domain news on my site, but mostly editorials and feature articles.

Best aggregators are...
http://Domaining.com
http://NameBee.com
http://DNHeadlines.com

 

[Biggie]

What are the top sources for real-time domain news?

thanks

the top sources are straight from the "horses mouth"

everything else is second-hand or gossip

and some of the second-hand stuff is mostly fluff, scare tactics, "you promote me and i'll promote you" and other opinionated bs

if you want first hand news, then try to communicate with the news makers....not the story breakers

real-time:

sedo
afternic
namejet
pool
snapnames

and other boards and venues where the newsmakers post their thoughts, plans and accomplishments


imo...

 

[gaetanomarano]

.

just a question... it does exist (here or elsewhere) a complete and detailed directory of all domains-related websites, forums and blogs?

.

 

[Theo]

Only DomainGang.com announces the news before it even happens!

 

[gaetanomarano]

Only DomainGang.com announces the news before it even happens!

I haven't found any advertising rates page on your blog

if your prices are in the price range of DNXpert or TeenDomainer I'm interested to buy an ad space on your blog

.

 

[Theo]

I charge $1.000.000 Italian lira per square pixel.

 

[Sonny Banks]

I charge $1.000.000 Italian lira per square pixel.

lol

 

[gaetanomarano]

I charge $1.000.000 Italian lira per square pixel.

the italian lira no longer exists... however, at your "cheap" prices, I can buy... a micron... :lol:

.

 

[Theo]

I don't advertise for spammers and I am not cheap.

 

[gaetanomarano]

I don't advertise for spammers and I am not cheap.

it's strange, since, seeing your avatar, you seem have thirst of spammer's blood... :lol:

.

 

[Tia Wood]

-

 

[Theo]

Carter tried to hook me up with his cousin, Magdalena once. But you're confusing him for this other Italian guy, Gaetano. Capice?

 

[Sonny Banks]

Magdalena? :lol::lol::lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m2KkgsW2-QQ&feature=PlayList&p=C15FFA9D1E44DE4E&index=0

 

[simon johnson]

Of course I'd say DomainerIncome.com, but Acro is right about DomainGang, reporting news before it happens - its the psychic domaining news network (I won't do the acronym for it).

 

[james2002]

You may also have a look at Domain Name Review

We recently acquired its plural version domain and we will continue to provide domain news there.

 

[broe-foe]

the top sources are straight from the "horses mouth"

everything else is second-hand or gossip

and some of the second-hand stuff is mostly fluff, scare tactics, "you promote me and i'll promote you" and other opinionated bs

if you want first hand news, then try to communicate with the news makers....not the story breakers

real-time:

sedo
afternic
namejet
pool
snapnames

and other boards and venues where the newsmakers post their thoughts, plans and accomplishments


imo...

I would guess Snapnames would be good for in-house shill-bidding and fraud updates, although those updates might come 4 or 5 years after-the-fact. History has proven this to be fact, not fiction.

Why anyone in this business continues to mention Snapnames and their auction results along side other auctioneers who have not been proven to be "tainted" by fraud and shill-bidding is beyond me. It's as though domainers don't give a crap about stealing, fraud, felony crime, and lack of ethics. Snapnames should have been boycotted out of business by now, but instead we whistle along and pretend like nothing happened. This is bizarre and surreal.

 

[peter]

i agree. not a chance in hell i will ever use snapnames or anything to do with them/oversee

 

[Biggie]

I would guess Snapnames would be good for in-house shill-bidding and fraud updates, although those updates might come 4 or 5 years after-the-fact. History has proven this to be fact, not fiction.

Why anyone in this business continues to mention Snapnames and their auction results along side other auctioneers who have not been proven to be "tainted" by fraud and shill-bidding is beyond me. It's as though domainers don't give a crap about stealing, fraud, felony crime, and lack of ethics. Snapnames should have been boycotted out of business by now, but instead we whistle along and pretend like nothing happened. This is bizarre and surreal.

i agree. not a chance in hell i will ever use snapnames or anything to do with them/oversee

that's two less competitors i'll have to worry about bidding against

any others ....