closed My today`s catch

[stuff]

Hello

Please appraise:

bushgardensinc.com - search in google and You find :
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center



ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

Anheuser-Busch Incorporated v. Fernand Dumas a/k/a The Plant Doctor

Case No. D2001-0651



1. The Parties

1.1 The Complainant is Anheuser-Busch, Incorporated, a corporation having its principal place of business at One Busch Place, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.

1.2 The Respondent is Fernand Dumas, a/k/a The Plant Doctor, an individual having an address at 11146 Grapefruit Lane, Punta Gorda, Florida, United States of America.



2. The Domain Names and Registrars

The domain names at issue are <floridabushgardens.com>, <bush-gardens.net>, <bushgardensfl.com>, <bushgardens.net>, <bush-gardens.com>, <bushgardensflorida.com>, <bushfl.com>, and <bushgardensinc.com>, which domain names are registered with Network Solutions, Inc., based in Herndon, Virginia ("NSI"), United States of America.


I think I could make some money with it.

Thanks

 

[domaingator]

Trust DG, you will lose. You will not make money. You have made a classic beginner's mistake and assumption. Stop registering domains with trademarks if you know what is good for you.

 

[stuff]

Originally posted by domaingator
Trust DG, you will lose. You will not make money. You have made a classic beginner's mistake and assumption. Stop registering domains with trademarks if you know what is good for you.

They sued not me..- This case was two years ago, but why they let this domain go now? When they two years ago sued someone for this domain.

 

[jimb]

maybe they just want to sue again? Maybe they got too much money to throw around...


Jim

 

Originally posted by stuff
Hello

Please appraise:

bushgardensinc.com - search in google and You find :
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center



ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

Anheuser-Busch Incorporated v. Fernand Dumas a/k/a The Plant Doctor

Case No. D2001-0651
______________________________________________

Well.. who one??

I would assume BushGardens in Florida right?


What was the outcome?

and the reason why they let it go, is cause.. if they were the winning side of the case.. then they know, they are protected & no one will be foolish enough to reg' that name..

which side won the case?

 

[stuff]

jimb- maybe yes, Bu i don`t think so

WandaMAy- read it http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-0651.html

 

Originally posted by stuff
jimb- maybe yes, Bu i don`t think so

WandaMAy- read it http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2001/d2001-0651.html

i'll catch that read later..

guess the PlantDr. lost.


i missed that he was an 'individual' in my first 'quick glance' at your orig. post.

i was thinkN it was BushGardens VS An.Bush

Think I oughta put my SupplyBay.com up for Auction at
eBay??

 

It was a dumb UDRP decision in the first place.

TM's are granted on coined/proprietary terms like "Busch Gardens" by the USPTO and then the owners of these fanciful tm's can go after descriptive/common terms like "bush gardens" and prevail at UDRP.

BTW, the domain "bushgardensinc.com" has absolutely no value whatsoever to anyone other than an entity trading as "Bush Gardens, Inc".

They didn't win bushgardensinc.com in the udrp decision (but they did win some others)

 

[jeroenp]

< MOD EDIT >

Please refrain from posting this sort of material, also, you may consider respecting the privacy of your sold domains new owners.

< / MOD EDIT >