- Joined
- Oct 8, 2002
- Messages
- 2,571
- Reaction score
- 4
It's been mentioned before that DNForum threads are sometimes trotted out in UDRP complaints as evidence of one thing or another.
Last night, I responded to one of the most spectacularly incompetent UDRP complaints I have ever seen. They admit in the complaint that the domain name was registered years prior to any use of the mark, but they actually argue that the UDRP does not require a domain name to have been registered in bad faith.
But, here it is, verbatim from the Complaint:
"Furthermore, on information and belief, Respondent is a 'platinum lifetime member' of 'dnforum.com,' a website dedicated to the buying and selling of domain names."
Holy cow!
I mean, sure, if he was a "gold member", then he might not be a cybersquatter...
But those "platinum members", well, those people are scum, pure and simple.
Last night, I responded to one of the most spectacularly incompetent UDRP complaints I have ever seen. They admit in the complaint that the domain name was registered years prior to any use of the mark, but they actually argue that the UDRP does not require a domain name to have been registered in bad faith.
But, here it is, verbatim from the Complaint:
"Furthermore, on information and belief, Respondent is a 'platinum lifetime member' of 'dnforum.com,' a website dedicated to the buying and selling of domain names."
Holy cow!
I mean, sure, if he was a "gold member", then he might not be a cybersquatter...
But those "platinum members", well, those people are scum, pure and simple.