Geschätzten Strandanzug Zuccarini - gegen - Toyota - Klassenkamerade - Vorhut

[signguy]

domainpairs,

fyi.......

>>> www.AnyUrl.com - my domains for sale are here

not resolving

 

[HOWARD]

I have no intention of disclosing any attorney/client privileged matters. The posting above simply shows the type of person that Zuccarini is. He thought that I should go to jail for him by defying a court order. And that was after I took him into my home and introduced him to my family and associates.

 

[Fearless]

Originally posted by beatz


Yeah but as this can *always* happen ( you never know) i would like to be sure that if this would happen ( not parting on good terms ) my ex lawyer would still be bound to some nondisclosure thing, or even better would not disclose anything simply just out of business ethics principles.

I think he just stated his opinions and didn't disclose any information that couldn't be found by anyone.

 

[DomainPairs]

Originally posted by signguy
domainpairs,

fyi.......

>>> www.AnyUrl.com - my domains for sale are here

not resolving

Thanks for mentioning this Signguy. I ought to have changed my sig. I have a reseller hosting account with a co. that was hit by the recent Verio problems. I moved most of my sites onto a different server using and b/w supplier (but still with the same hosting co.) and whilst doing this I thought I would take the chance to do a bit of restructuring. I still haven't finished AnyURL yet. I'm sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused..

 

[DropWizard.com]

Well I know Howard but I don't know John. However John's sites are a blight on the internet with his pop up hell.

He's probably done more singlehandedly to give webmasters a bad name than anyone I can think of.

Howard on the other hand has always acted honorably and represented me on C& D's. Someone I can recommend.

And John the last time I checked a "Summary Judgement", which you referred to; is given because of no defense filed or an unsubstainable defense is presented in the eyes of the court.

Frankly a guy who picks up domain names that kids are typing in and then directing them to porn sites is the lowest piece of SHIT I can imagine.

Slither out of here.

 

[DaddyHalbucks]

John, you are not the only client Howard Neu has bad-mouthed.

I was dissatisfied with Howard Neu's legal services as well, and he bad mouthed me on a chat board.

He is not a registered patent attorney, and I really don't know what his qualifications are as for practicing intellectual property law.

All I know is that his email to an organization that desired one of my domains ended up being cited against me in a UDRP as an example "bad faith" that attached to me. Pretty lame, huh?

I lost the UDRP (although it was later withdrawn, thanks largely to another attorney who negotiated a settlement).

The worst part of my dealing with Howard Neu was when Howard posted a borderline libelous excoriation of me on Rick Schwartz's board. It was vicious.

In my opinion Howard breached his fiduciary duty to me as his client. I would never use him again. I almost complained to the bar association. Bad mouthing clients has got to be considered unethical.

My complaint to the bar would have largely been on the grounds that in my opinion he acted unprofessionally and in a manner unbecoming of a lawyer. But, given the close fraternity of the bar, I decided "why bother." I just would never hire him again.

I recommend Attorney Steve Sturgeon. Steve is a real gentleman. Find him at www.DomainESQ.com

Don't waste your valueable time and money or risk your domains.

~Hal Meyer

 

[Loun]

this thread was brought to my attention as some people in it are people i used to talk to and deal with a lot. I have also used howard for a couple small items that I had to have done. On a personal level i think he is an ok guy. I have met him in person in vegas. im not usually inot badmouthing people in public forums so im not going to. Just wanted to point out that there is in fact more than one lawyer available for someone to go to if they need legal assitance and if you need legal assistance just check people out before you use them.

my dealings with howard were very small, never dealt with a huge UDRP because i tend to back out before it gets to that point and settle. all i can report is that i remember paying what i considered a very large fee to have a disclaimer typed up that was maybe 4 sentences long, and I was asked to change it by the people I was protecting myself against. My current disclaimer is now 12 words long... I cant quote a price on that because i have had a computer crash since then.

I also had a domain that i sought help for negotiations with that ended up settling at the same price I was originally offered for it so I lost money after paying for the help. not sayign this was entirely howards fault as each situation is different and he cant be expected to always get more for somethign but merely because it proves sometimes its best to do it alone.

Not to mention I resigned from the aforementioned rick schwartz board because I witnessed the slandering of Hal in a public forum and brought it to his attention. At which time I was basically being run out of the board because i was a leak of information to non board members, as hal had already resigned membership there. Was a good place until it became a boys club

My suggestion is dont be a dick and you can settle most of the small things yourself... and

as signguy put it pop up hell = you are in fact a loser and if you use kid typein domains to redirect to porn popup hell then you are also a very retarded morally corrupt businessman ergo you should have been a politician or a lawyer anyway.

 

[HOWARD]

Having served as Mayor of a South Florida city for 3 terms, I've developed a thick skin when it comes to criticism. Suffice it to say that my beef with the Dot Com Cowboy was simply that I did a substantial amount of legal work for him for which he refused to pay. But I have never overcharged a client for work that was done and I'm proud to say that my clients feel that I have done a good job for them.

In this business, most clients come by word of mouth from webmaster to webmaster, so I cannot stand idly by while being castigated by those vocal few who feel the need to do so.

 

[Drewbert]

I agree wholeheartedly with Signguy and Gordon.

This guy's habit of pointing non-porn related terms at porn sites has harmed our industry IMMEASURABLY, and caused loads of problems, legally and with the public perception of us.

Anyone with half a brain should have seen that doing so would cause the aforementioned problems and would have crossed the idea off the "good idea list" even before starting to redirect any traffic. Given that John didn't, I'd say he's every bit the nutter that Howard claims he is.

Just my opinion, of course.

 

[Donna Mahony]

I have used Howards services on many, many occasions and he has NEVER let me down!

 

[DaddyHalbucks]

Howard,

Even if your non-payment claim against me were true, and even if you didn't screw up and cause me to needlessly lose a UDRP: as a lawyer and officer of the court you still have a fiduciary (trust) obligation to your clients. Period.

You can't bad-mouth clients for any reason.

#1. It is against your fiduciary responsibility
#2. It is against the rules of ethics for lawyers
#3. It shows you have the emotional IQ of a 2 year old (in my opinion)

If you continue with this practice, someday your license to practice law will be challenged.

~Hal Meyer

 

[JOHN ZUCCARINI1]

howard, YES YOU ARE AN IDIOT!!

Now let's tell everybody why AS OF JANUARY 18, 2001 you were no longer my lawyer.

You went to Philadelphia against my advice and a third parties advice who was very familiar with the electronics boutique case, to try and attend a hearing that was being held in court, and in which you were not invited or asked to attend.

At that time, not only had you been thrown off the case by the court, but an open hostility had been expressed by the court towards you.

It was our feeling there was a very good possibility you could be coerced to give the court information about me and threatened with jail if you did not do so.

You shrugged it off by saying, "Oh I've been to jail before, that wouldn't bother me."

In fact our concern was so strong that you could be threatened with jail that we had an attorney standing by all day with a telephone line open just to take a call from you if in fact this did happen.

And of course, as you know that is exactly what happened.

You went to Philadelphia, the court would not let you attend the hearing, and then as you waited in hallway of the courthouse you were approached by scott o'keefe, an attorney I hired just for that 1 day to attend this hearing.

As it turns out, not only that day was I betrayed by you, but I was betrayed by scott o'keefe also, who agreed to partake in the scheme to entrap me which unfolded.

scott told you straight out, if you did not tell the court where I lived, since they had not been able to find me, you would be put in jail.

So here we are howard, right where we thought we might be.

You are threatened with jail, unless you reveal only information that protected my freedom.

And what did you do, yes that's right, you told them unbelievably, without hesitation were I lived.

In spite of the fact, we had an attorney standing by to get out you out of jail if that did happen.

You also knew that if you were put in jail, this would be immediately appealed and would never have been left to stand by an appellate judge for more than a few minutes.

So to save yourself howard, you turned me in.

Somebody must have been on my side that day, since it was only mostly by pure luck and sheer circumstance I was able to avoid the trap that awaited me at my apartment.

An apartment I had been in just 3 weeks and you were the only person who knew where I lived. I had not even told my family.

So why howard did you really go to Philadelphia. We know why you went, you said you were going to go to defend my postion.

How could you have defended my positon. We all knew you would not even be allowed to attend the hearing.

The reason you went to Philadelphia was so that you could could charge me $3,000 to do it.

That's the only reason you went.

So I think it's time you stop the ****ing bullshit howard and do what you need to do, that is go **** yourself - !!

In fact go **** yourself about 7 or 8 times - !! - If you got the stamina, which I doubt -

 

[Donna Mahony]

Prior post sounds like the rantings of a crazy man!

 

[JOHN ZUCCARINI1]

howard, so what's the problem, you can't talk -

speechless....ludicrous........irrelevant..........indefinable.......incoherent.....insubstantial

or maybe it's all just too.........incomprehensible - !!!

 

[edisaacson]

Well if he keeps posting this nonsense, he'll have enough DNF Bucks to pay off his fines

 

[cpr]

Ranting raving mad... no doubt!
Anyone who has met Howard would know in a heartbeat what an awesome person he is.
Howard is truly a gentleman.
I truly think JOHN ZUCCARINI has trouble with his perception reality
Essentially I think he needs help.

 

[Fearless]

Originally posted by JOHN ZUCCARINI
that is go **** yourself - !!

In fact go **** yourself about 7 or 8 times - !! - If you got the stamina, which I doubt -

John, you can post here, but you need to cut this stuff out of your posts. We all know what **** means.

 

[Donna Mahony]

Originally posted by JOHN ZUCCARINI
howard, so what's the problem, you can't talk -

speechless....ludicrous........irrelevant..........indefinable.......incoherent.....insubstantial

or maybe it's all just too.........incomprehensible - !!!

I personally don't see anything in your post worthy of a response

 

[JOHN ZUCCARINI1]

gregr - you want some perfect names I got some for you -

but as you know howard is a ****ing jackass - and that's I'm calling him

So goodbye dnforum

 

[Fearless]

Originally posted by JOHN ZUCCARINI


So goodbye dnforum

Bye John