What's the big secret ?

[britishbulldog]

With these parking companies,why don't any of them show clarity with the revenue splits,

i believe they must be all paying a terrible split to the domainer, can't think of any rqason why they hide it,i mean normally you would hide something if it's shady or pittyful ?

anybody know any splits ?

 

[JB Lions]

If it was clear, they couldn't really "adjust" much. Probably fluctuates based on various factors, revenue goals etc.

 

[Theo]

It varies. I believe it's 60% at Sedo (what you keep).

The real issue is not the parking company but the ad stream provider, they keep a large chunk of the money from advertisers.

 

[britishbulldog]

Yeah nice one acro,i know google keep 32% and pay 68%......

Where did you get sedo's split from i don't see it on their site anywhere ?

 

[katherine]

The ad stream provider actually has agreements in place, that forbid disclosing details of the payment structure.
When are we going to start auditing this business ?

 

[britishbulldog]

The ad stream provider actually has agreements in place, that forbid disclosing details of the payment structure.
When are we going to start auditing this business ?

Yes i underdstand that probably because they pay different sites different splits thats why they want to keep it a secret but surely the parking companies can advertise their own splits what they pay their customers ?

 

[katherine]

surely the parking companies can advertise their own splits what they pay their customers ?

AFAIK no.

 

[britishbulldog]

AFAIK no.

I cannnot belive that why would say google be interested in what split you pay when they clearly advertise what they themselves pay ?

 

[Tom K.]

Ad revenue on parked sites is much lower than content sites. Content sites provide value to visitors, build trust and, as such, traffic quality is superior than parked sites. There is no surprise that Google would place ads on parked sites at a much lower per click rate.

 

[dmyre]

Ad revenue on parked sites is much lower than content sites. Content sites provide value to visitors, build trust and, as such, traffic quality is superior than parked sites. There is no surprise that Google would place ads on parked sites at a much lower per click rate.

Agreed, but which one has a higher CTR?

 

[companyone]

Its perfectly clear...

They operate under the definition of ...full transparency according to the "obama administration" ( none)

Broadcast your daily splits...on C-Span!...I mean "domain parking - Span.

Peace!

Dan


___________

 

[Tom K.]

Agreed, but which one has a higher CTR?

Parking has higher CTR.

 

[DexSmart]

u can keep parking as long as u provide some quality advertise, i think!

 

[David G]

Parking has higher CTR.

Significantly better vs developed, anywhere from 5 to as much as 15 times or more CTR with parking, imo.

That does not mean I don't like development. There are other benefits beyond lower CTRs.

 

[DomainsInc]

parking revenues are in the gutter. will they ever come back? i don't even bother to check my stats anymore...