Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

$100,000 damages per domain for cybersquatting ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PeterMan

Level 8
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2005
Messages
1,518
Reaction score
1
The plaintiffs had attempted to bring a class action against multiple defendants for purported trademark infringement, cybersquatting and deceptive trade practices

Most likely that part in bold had a lot to do with this imho...
 

Prospecting

Prospecting
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
intent is key, deceptive or not, intent to infringe is key.
 

pwr1019

Level 1
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
"it could also have deprived trademark owners of the right to recover statutory damages of up to $100,000 per domain name for cybersquatting."

could have.....up to 100,000 - far cry from any kind of actual award
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Who has viewed this thread (Total: 1) View details

Who has watched this thread (Total: 1) View details

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

Upcoming events

Latest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators

Top Bottom