• Welcome to DNForum.com - Domain Investor Forum, Free Domain Marketplace and a community for 45+ domain pros
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Antoine de Saint Exupery

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ovicide

New Member
The Originals
Legacy Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2003
Messages
202
Reaction score
0
This decision orders the following names transferred to the complainant:
<antoinedesaintexupery.com>, <saint-exupery.com> and <saintexupery.com>.

It is dated June 9, 2005.
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-0165.html

The domain names refer to Antoine de Saint Exupery, a French author and pilot.

He's well-known as author of "The Little Prince"
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0156012197/
and was a close friend of Charles Lindbergh.

He died during a military mission in World War 2.

The "Factual Background" of the decision says:
The Complainant is the owner of the French registered trademark ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY, as well as International Trademark ANTOINE DE SAINT EXUPERY in the Austria, Belgium, Luxemburg, Switzerland, Germany, Spain, Italy, Liechtenstein and Portugal.

The Respondent operates a website currently dedicated to the work of Antoine de Saint Exupery using the disputed domain name <saint-exupery.com>, where he provides information about Antoine de Saint Exupery, as well as offers links to commercial websites that sell various merchandise, including the books, related to Antoine de Saint Exupery.

The complaiant is in France, the respondent is in the British Virgin Islands.

The panel found:
...the Respondent's arguments that the name of famous deceased persons should not be protected as trademarks are not relevant...

The panel found bad faith because the respondent's site contains affiliate links to amazon.com, and barnesandnoble.com, etc.

Is this decision fair?
 
Ovicide said:
offers links to commercial websites that sell various merchandise, including the books, related to Antoine de Saint Exupery.

That's practically the main reason why the respondent lost.
 
Bunch of crap. Why don't they claim TheLittlePrince.com as well?
 
Hey George. Funny how the world turns :-D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom