closed Better than math.com!

[GeorgeKGeorgeK is verified member.]

My newest baby is priceless to me.....

VerisignSucks.com!! :wink:

 

[VisualDigits]

I agree with that phrase.

$X-$XX to the right end user!

Trademark issues!

 

[GeorgeKGeorgeK is verified member.]

hehe Well, I'm the end user, so it won't have any TM issues (it'll be a free speech site, documenting all the abuses of VeriSign).

It only took a few minutes after I posted for VeriSign to visit my personal website.

h87.s239.verisign.com - - [27/Apr/2005:14:55:14 -0400] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 200 7464 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041107 Firefox/1.0"

I must be doing something right. arty:

 

[mikesherov]

9th circuit says "Sucks" is OK:

http://bobparsons.com/9thcircuitsaysSucksisOKAtoolthatsendsSPAMReallystrangedomainnamest.html

nice catch George K. Hope you get through to those knuckleheads.

 

[Salient]

Im in the dark completely, but wish to see the light. Please indulge me!

Regards,
Stuart.

 

[Theo]

Was that a drop or a purchase? And no, not better than math.com :-D
Unless Verislime pays you to buy it.

 

[GeorgeKGeorgeK is verified member.]

I'd never sell it.

It was a drop, and SnapNames got it for me (I was the only bidder, woohoo!).

 

[uglypeoople.com]

is verisign and network solutions the same company???

thanks!

 

[GeorgeKGeorgeK is verified member.]

Verisign sold 85% of NSI to another firm, but retains 15%.

 

[diverge]

Re: verisignsucks.com which redirects to http://www.petitioncenter.com/verisign-dns/

I thought Verisign stopped this practice within months of beginning it? But your petitiion is still active, with recent signatures. I know this thread is old, but I thought this the best place to reply (saw verisignsucks.com on one of your whois records).

So, is this still a valid concern, or is this petition outdated?

 

[GeorgeKGeorgeK is verified member.]

Under the new .com agreement, VeriSign could apply to re-launch it (or other new registry "services"). .travel (Tralliance) recently tried to do the same, but was denied, see:

http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/