• Welcome to DNForum.com™ - Domain Sales, Domain Forum, Domain Appraisals, Domain Registrars
    If you are new to domains and looking to buy, sell and learn about domains then you have come to the right place. DNForum is the oldest global domain name community on the internet and continues to grow every day. There are over 45,000 domainers on DNForum doing everything from buying domains, selling domains, using our free in-house built tools, learning about domains and discussing domains. Take a minute and Register.

Censorship on DNF?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gerry

Dances With Dogs
Legacy Exclusive Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2006
Messages
14,984
Reaction score
1,302
When is it determined and by whom is it determined to place restrictions on what or how much a member can write in a post?

If DNF is going to practice censorship, then it needs to censor itself.

Moderators that come onto threads to not act as a moderator but to express their personal likes and dislikes is one thing.

But when that moderator is challanged on comments made and then claims that they were not speaking as a moderator, then they need to lose the moderator designation.

Put the badge on, take the badge off.

And moderators who "moderate" a thread when they have an overt or a covert dislike for the subject or certain members should not be the moderator in that thread.
 
Upvote 0
And that's the truth...

What an ego you have, mauronis :lol:
PS Did you just come to Gerry's defense here? Cause if I'm not mistaken you just popped up like a mushroom (in lack of better word) when I mentioned .mobi

[edit]

Anyway, I've taken enough bait for now. I'll get right on that bologna steak you wanted ascroplex...

[/edit]
 
Speaking of bologna, concierge boy, here's another chart for you.

The spikes are identical for all three major forums. The sub-decimal differences are trivial.

Maybe you need to tell us which college classes you skipped; so far it was Statistics 101.
 
PS Did you just come to Gerry's defense here? Cause if I'm not mistaken you just popped up like a mushroom (in lack of better word) when I mentioned .mobi
Darling, Gerry needs no defense, no backup, no one to fight his fights. Has this not been made clear? It should by now be crystal clear.

But allow me again to state:

This is not about .mobi, this is not about .com, this is about an issue of censorship. I assure you that many on this thread have no clue what this is regarding. Now, as usual, this has come so far off track.

Out of respect for Adam, who has already stated that he will look into this issue, this whole matter needs to be put to rest.

This is all I am asking.

If you all want to hijack this thread and make it into what you want to then by all means continue on.
 
I don't care how you slice it, you are at 2004 traffic levels off of a high around MAY and then about SEPTEMBER 2006.

What do you suggest is the reason for the drop off in traffic. I have yet to hear anything more reasonable than my theory. Just hot air.

Let's leave this thread and post continuing assaults on my theory here.

Let's hear your reasoning.
 
Just hot air.

I think you summed up your involvement here on the forum very well.
We rest our case.
Good night.
 
Darling, Gerry needs no defense, no backup, no one to fight his fights.

You make me blush :blush: Truth be told I like teasing you honey and I know you don't need backup of the tribe...

But your buddy did make a comment about hijacking the thread :)
 
I don't care how you slice it, you are at 2004 traffic levels off of a high around MAY and then about SEPTEMBER 2006.

What do you suggest is the reason for the drop off in traffic. I have yet to hear anything more reasonable than my theory. Just hot air.

Let's leave this thread and post continuing assaults on my theory here.

Let's hear your reasoning.

You sound like a self-fulfilled prophecy, crackling on 78 rpm vinyl. If DNF does not meet your 'high standards' why are you here?
 
I am a record collector :ok: and most 78's are volcanized rubber, not vinyl.

I joined because someone said it was better than NP. They were wrong. NP is better :puke:

I don't have terribly high standards. I just like no ego, arrogance, elitism, pompousness, or ignorance. That shouldn't be too much to ask on a business forum, should it?

Why do I want to hear from people not invested in my investment how stupid they think it is? Why don't you ask the droves of people who are leaving in an exit review. My theory is that they will say the likes of you.

Why don't you leave this thread and post continuing assaults on my theory here.

Let's hear your reasoning.
You sound like a self-fulfilled prophecy on 78 rpm vinyl. If DNF does not meet your 'high standards' why are you here?
 
Let's not go down the "Alexa graph chart" road again.....pleeeeease!
 
I joined because someone said it was better than NP. They were wrong. NP is better :puke:

Then **** off and stay at NP's. I am a member there as well. Just don't come up with such BS, it's your trademark dish.
 
It's not BS just because you say so and cannot come up with an intelligent response other than to make a mockery of my name. That is exactly the point I'm making. Anyway, if you want to bash my theory do so in my traffic thread. At least do something right.
Then **** off and stay at NP's. I am a member there as well. Just don't come up with such BS, it's your trademark dish.
 
With 77 posts in 2 years you really are in no position to claim anything about DNF, and lurkers like yourself might contribute to the lack of activity on the forum lately out of fear of censorship as this thread was started to reference and address. The traffic and activity used to be greater here because it was more of a "wild west" type forum and there were alot of heated debates and drama. Now there is ALOT less. This forum is and always will be BETTER than any other one for a host of reasons I do not have the time or motivation to list here, suffice to say if you love NP's so much the question is obvious as to your motivations here...
 
You and acroplex seem to equate posts with visits. That's inaccurate. One may visit, observe, form opinions, and learn all without leaving a footprint. I have read many many threads.

I don't play at NP because there is some very similar to the antagonists here - there. Actually some exactly similar too. That's why.

But, I may start getting my moneysworth here since I can't get it back. I think it was $60 or something for platinum. I'll crunch the numbers and see how long that keeps me here for.

Anyway, why don't you attack me in my thread, not Doc's. I've already apologized for muddying it up.

With 77 posts in 2 years you really are in no position to claim anything about DNF, and lurkers like yourself might contribute to the lack of activity on the forum lately out of fear of censorship as this thread was started to reference and address. The traffic and activity used to be greater here because it was more of a "wild west" type forum and there were alot of heated debates and drama. Now there is ALOT less. This forum is and always will be BETTER than any other one for a host of reasons I do not have the time or motivation to list here, suffice to say if you love NP's so much the question is obvious as to your motivations here...
 
It's not BS just because you say so and cannot come up with an intelligent response other than to make a mockery of my name. That is exactly the point I'm making. Anyway, if you want to bash my theory do so in my traffic thread. At least do something right.


Oh please now. You're running for cover already. First, you hijack Doc Com's thread, bashing DNF, then you act as if you're playing by the rules and we don't.

What I do right or wrong does not include your input because you have no interest being here. You said so yourself.
 
yeah, actually nobody has attacked you...you started calling people names and bashing DNF and I am defending the best forum on the Internet...I do not see where I have attacked you, maybe just pointed out the obvious. I'm sorry if you cannot handle the response.
 
But, I may start getting my moneysworth here since I can't get it back. I think it was $60 or something for platinum. I'll crunch the numbers and see how long that keeps me here for.

Send me your Paypal, I will send you $75 right now. Then you'll have no more arguments left. I am tired of this BS pseudo-victim talk.
 
yeah we are helping you "get your money's worth" since obviously you don't do much domain business here..that might tell you something about your place in this industry.
 
PM sent. I mean what I say. I'll be gone with your paypal refund.
Send me your Paypal, I will send you $75 right now. Then you'll have no more arguments left. I am tired of this BS pseudo-victim talk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom